What number of squamous epithelial cells per high-power field (hpf) makes a clean catch urine sample unreliable?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Squamous Epithelial Cells in Clean Catch Urine Specimens

More than 10 squamous epithelial cells per high-power field in a urinalysis sample indicates contamination and suggests the need for recollection of a clean catch specimen. 1

Understanding Urine Contamination

Squamous epithelial cells (SECs) in urine samples are commonly used as markers of specimen contamination. Their presence in significant numbers suggests that the sample may contain contaminants from the external genitalia, potentially affecting the reliability of the urinalysis results.

Key Thresholds:

  • >10 SECs per high-power field (HPF): Widely accepted threshold indicating contamination 1
  • >8 SECs per low-power field: Associated with reduced diagnostic performance of urinalysis for detecting bacteriuria 2

Evidence on Contamination Assessment

The relationship between SECs and urine contamination is complex:

  • A 2016 study found that SEC count was actually a poor predictor of urine culture contamination (area under ROC curve = 0.680) 2
  • However, samples with fewer than 8 SECs/LPF predicted bacteriuria better (sensitivity=75%, specificity=84%) than samples with more than 8 SECs/LPF (sensitivity=86%, specificity=70%) 2
  • A 1998 study showed that squamous cells were present in 94% of catheterized samples (which had no bacterial contamination) and 96% of midstream samples (of which only 21% had bacterial contamination) 3

Impact on Clinical Decision-Making

When evaluating urinalysis results:

  • Samples with >10 SECs/HPF should be considered potentially contaminated 1
  • The presence of both >10 WBCs and significant epithelial cells strongly suggests contamination 1
  • Urinalysis indices are often abnormal in disease-free women even with ideal collection technique, with only nitrite showing high specificity 4

Collection Techniques and Contamination Rates

Collection method significantly impacts contamination rates:

  • Clean-catch midstream void specimens: 0-29% contamination rate 1
  • Bag collection methods: 12-83% contamination rate 1
  • Catheterization: Provides highest sensitivity (95%) and specificity (99%) 1

Improving Collection Quality

Illustrated instructions have been shown to reduce contamination rates from 40% to 25% by improving proper collection technique 5. Key elements of proper technique include:

  • Hand washing
  • Cleaning with a towelette
  • Beginning to void, then stopping and collecting the midstream portion 1

Clinical Implications

A 2005 study highlighted that nephrologist-performed urinalysis is superior to laboratory-performed urinalysis in determining correct diagnoses, with nephrologists more likely to recognize renal tubular epithelial cells, granular casts, and dysmorphic red blood cells 6. Laboratory technicians may incorrectly identify renal tubular epithelial cells as squamous epithelial cells.

Bottom Line

When evaluating urine specimens, consider samples with more than 10 squamous epithelial cells per high-power field as potentially contaminated and consider recollection with proper clean catch technique. However, recognize that the presence of squamous cells alone is not a perfect predictor of bacterial contamination, and clinical context remains important in interpretation.

References

Guideline

Urine Specimen Collection and Contamination

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Urinary Squamous Epithelial Cells Do Not Accurately Predict Urine Culture Contamination, but May Predict Urinalysis Performance in Predicting Bacteriuria.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2016

Research

Comparison and interpretation of urinalysis performed by a nephrologist versus a hospital-based clinical laboratory.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.