Can the presence of squamous cells in a urinalysis (urine analysis) indicate contamination?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Presence of Squamous Cells in Urinalysis as an Indicator of Contamination

Yes, the presence of squamous cells in a urinalysis is a potential indicator of urine specimen contamination, though this relationship is not as strong or reliable as commonly believed. 1, 2

Understanding Squamous Cells in Urine Specimens

  • Squamous epithelial cells (SECs) in urine typically originate from the distal urethra, vagina (in women), or skin during collection, and their presence has traditionally been associated with contamination 1, 3
  • However, research shows that SECs are actually a poor predictor of bacterial contamination in urine cultures, with one study finding only a 21% predictive value for contamination in midstream clean-catch samples 1
  • Squamous cells were found in 94-96% of both catheterized and midstream samples in one study, yet contamination rates varied significantly between collection methods 1

Relationship Between Squamous Cells and Specimen Quality

  • Higher numbers of squamous cells (>8 SECs/low-powered field) may predict poorer performance of traditional urinalysis measures in detecting bacteriuria 2
  • The presence of squamous cells along with multiple bacterial species or low colony counts (<50,000 CFU/mL) is more indicative of contamination than squamous cells alone 4, 5
  • A urine sample with more than 10 WBCs and a significant number of epithelial cells should be considered contaminated, requiring improved collection techniques 6

Collection Methods and Contamination Rates

  • Contamination rates vary significantly by collection method, with bag collection showing the highest rates (22-68%) compared to midstream clean-catch (8-27%) 6
  • Catheterization and suprapubic aspiration provide the most reliable specimens with minimal contamination 6, 4
  • Even with proper midstream clean-catch technique, some degree of squamous cell presence is expected and does not automatically invalidate results 1, 2

Clinical Implications and Best Practices

  • When evaluating a urinalysis with squamous cells:
    • Consider the collection method used 6, 4
    • Look for other indicators of contamination (mixed bacterial flora, low colony counts) 4, 5
    • Assess the clinical context and presence of other urinalysis findings (pyuria, bacteriuria) 4, 5
  • For definitive diagnosis of UTI, both pyuria and bacteriuria should be present, along with a significant colony count (≥50,000 CFU/mL) of a single uropathogen 4, 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not reject or discount urinalysis results based solely on the presence of squamous cells 1, 2
  • Avoid over-reliance on squamous cell count as the sole determinant of specimen quality 2
  • Remember that laboratory technicians may sometimes misidentify renal tubular epithelial cells as squamous cells, potentially affecting interpretation 7
  • Written instructions alone for proper clean-catch technique may not significantly reduce contamination rates 8

References

Research

Urinary Squamous Epithelial Cells Do Not Accurately Predict Urine Culture Contamination, but May Predict Urinalysis Performance in Predicting Bacteriuria.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2016

Guideline

Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections Based on Colony Forming Units

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Urinary Tract Infection Diagnosis Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Comparison and interpretation of urinalysis performed by a nephrologist versus a hospital-based clinical laboratory.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.