What is the recommended approach for hybrid fixation in both bone forearm fractures?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Hybrid Fixation in Both Bone Forearm Fractures

For both bone forearm fractures, hybrid fixation using a combination of plate fixation for one bone and intramedullary fixation for the other bone is recommended when anatomical reduction cannot be achieved with a single fixation method alone. This approach balances the benefits of different fixation techniques while minimizing their individual complications.

Surgical Approach and Technique

Initial Assessment

  • Obtain standard radiographic views (posteroanterior, lateral, and oblique) for proper fracture evaluation 1
  • Consider CT scans for complex fracture patterns to identify displaced fragments and fracture orientation 1
  • Assess fracture stability, displacement, and comminution to determine optimal fixation strategy

Hybrid Fixation Technique

  1. Plate Fixation (typically for radius):

    • Use a volar approach between flexor carpi radialis and radial artery 2
    • Perform anatomical reduction under direct visualization
    • Apply small-fragment compression plate with at least 3 bicortical screws proximal and distal to fracture 2
    • Ensure plate length is sufficient to provide secure fixation (minimum 5 screws total) to reduce nonunion risk 3
  2. Intramedullary Fixation (typically for ulna):

    • Approach along subcutaneous border between flexor carpi ulnaris and extensor carpi ulnaris 2
    • Insert intramedullary rod/nail with limited open approach as needed 4
    • Verify reduction fluoroscopically
  3. Verification:

    • Ensure anatomic reduction, especially restoration of radial bow 2
    • Confirm motion/stability of elbow and wrist joints 2
    • Obtain intraoperative radiographs to verify alignment

Evidence-Based Considerations

Advantages of Hybrid Fixation

  • Combines stability of plate fixation with less invasive intramedullary technique
  • May reduce overall surgical exposure compared to plating both bones
  • Allows for anatomical reduction of complex fractures
  • Preserves periosteal blood supply in the bone treated with intramedullary fixation

Potential Complications

  • Hardware migration (particularly with intramedullary fixation) 4
  • Infection risk (higher with open approaches) 4
  • Loss of reduction 4
  • Nerve injury 4
  • Decreased range of motion 4
  • Radioulnar synostosis (particularly in patients with head injuries) 3

Important Technical Considerations

  • Plate Selection: Use plates long enough to provide secure fixation with at least 5 screws total to reduce nonunion risk (nonunion rate is four times higher with only 4 screws) 3
  • Anatomic Reduction: Critical for restoration of motion and function, especially restoring the radial bow 2
  • Early Mobilization: Initiate early finger motion to prevent edema and stiffness 1
  • Avoid Dorsal Approach: Prefer volar approach for radial fractures to minimize risk to posterior interosseous nerve 2

Special Situations

  • Open Fractures: Can typically be treated with irrigation, debridement, and immediate fixation 2
  • Comminuted Fractures: Bone grafting is rarely indicated even in comminuted fractures 2
  • Unstable Patterns: May require more robust fixation; consider plate fixation for both bones in highly unstable patterns

Postoperative Management

  • Initiate early finger motion exercises to prevent stiffness 1
  • Regular assessment of wound healing and radiographic union 1
  • Monitor for hardware-related pain or complications 1
  • Consider directed home exercise program for rehabilitation 1

By following these principles for hybrid fixation in both bone forearm fractures, surgeons can achieve optimal outcomes with union rates of ≥95%, restoration of forearm strength and stability, and low complication rates 2.

References

Guideline

Fracture Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Both-Bones Forearm Fractures.

JBJS essential surgical techniques, 2015

Research

Complications of plate fixation of forearm fractures.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1983

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.