Medical Workup for MASLD De Novo
The recommended medical workup for MASLD (Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease) should follow a multi-step approach starting with blood-based fibrosis scores followed by liver elastography to assess fibrosis stage, which is the key determinant of prognosis and management. 1
Initial Assessment
Step 1: Risk Factor Identification
- Identify cardiometabolic risk factors:
- Type 2 diabetes
- Abdominal obesity with ≥1 additional metabolic risk factor
- Abnormal liver function tests
- Hypertension (>130/85 mmHg)
- Dyslipidemia (elevated triglycerides, low HDL)
Step 2: Exclusion of Alternative Etiologies
- Alcohol consumption assessment:
- Use validated instruments/biomarkers to quantify intake
- MASLD definition: <140g/week for women, <210g/week for men 1
- Rule out other causes of hepatic steatosis:
- Viral hepatitis (especially HCV)
- Drug-induced liver injury
- Genetic disorders (Wilson's disease, hypobetalipoproteinemia)
- Malnutrition or rapid weight loss
Fibrosis Assessment
Step 3: First-Line Non-Invasive Testing
- Blood-based fibrosis scores 1:
- FIB-4 index (first choice):
- Low risk: <1.3
- Indeterminate risk: 1.3-2.67
- High risk: >2.67
- APRI score:
- F3 thresholds: 0.5 (sensitivity cutoff), 1.5 (specificity cutoff)
- NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS):
- F3 thresholds: -1.455 (sensitivity cutoff), 0.676 (specificity cutoff)
- FIB-4 index (first choice):
Step 4: Second-Line Testing
- Liver elastography for patients with indeterminate or high-risk blood test results 1:
- Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE/FibroScan):
- F3 thresholds: 8 kPa (sensitivity cutoff), 12 kPa (specificity cutoff)
- 2D-SWE (ultrasound-based shear wave elastography):
- F3 thresholds: 8 kPa (sensitivity cutoff), 10.5 kPa (specificity cutoff)
- MR elastography (if available):
- F2: 3.14 kPa
- F3: 3.53 kPa
- F4: 4.45 kPa
- Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE/FibroScan):
Step 5: Advanced Fibrosis Markers (if available)
- Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test 1, 2:
- F3 thresholds: 7.7 (sensitivity cutoff), 9.8 (specificity cutoff)
- Other specialized tests:
- FAST score (FibroScan-AST): thresholds 0.35-0.67
- MAST score (MRI-AST): thresholds 0.165-0.242
- Corrected T1: thresholds 825-875 ms
Imaging Assessment
Step 6: Steatosis Quantification
- Ultrasound (first-line) 2:
- Sensitivity 84.8% and specificity 93.6% for moderate-severe steatosis
- Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) with VCTE 1:
- S1 (mild): 248 dB/m
- S2 (moderate): 268 dB/m
- S3 (severe): 280 dB/m
- MRI-PDFF (if available) 1:
- S1: 5%
- S2: 11-18%
- S3: 16-23%
Additional Workup
Step 7: Comorbidity Assessment
- Laboratory tests for related comorbidities 1:
- Fasting glucose, HbA1c
- Lipid profile (total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides)
- Renal function (creatinine, eGFR)
- Thyroid function
- Insulin resistance assessment (HOMA-IR) in patients without established diabetes
Step 8: Portal Hypertension Assessment (for advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis)
- For patients with LSM ≥20 kPa and/or platelet count <150×10^9/l 1:
- Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to screen for varices
- For ruling out clinically significant portal hypertension 1:
- LSM ≤15 kPa plus platelet count ≥150×10^9/l
Step 9: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Surveillance
- For patients with cirrhosis 1:
- Ultrasound with alpha-fetoprotein every 6 months
- For patients with F3 fibrosis 1:
- Consider surveillance based on individual risk assessment
Liver Biopsy Indications
Liver biopsy is not required for routine clinical management but should be considered when 1:
- Diagnostic uncertainty persists after non-invasive testing
- Alternative or concurrent liver diseases are suspected
- Definitive diagnosis of steatohepatitis is required (e.g., for clinical trials)
Follow-up Recommendations
- Low risk patients (FIB-4 <1.3): Reassess every 1-3 years 2
- Intermediate risk patients (FIB-4 1.3-2.67 with VCTE <8.0 kPa): Reassess within 1 year 2
- High risk patients (FIB-4 >2.67 or VCTE ≥8.0 kPa): Refer to hepatology for further evaluation 2
Pitfalls and Caveats
- LSM can be confounded by obesity; the threshold of LSM ≥25 kPa to rule in clinically significant portal hypertension is only applicable to non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m²) adults 1
- Non-invasive tests cannot assess microscopic features like ballooning or lobular inflammation 1
- Ultrasound-based HCC surveillance has low sensitivity in obese patients; adding alpha-fetoprotein measurement is recommended 2
- Current recommended non-invasive tests may have insufficient accuracy (<80%) for advanced fibrosis diagnosis; newer tests like FIB-9 may provide improved accuracy 3
By following this systematic approach, clinicians can effectively diagnose MASLD, assess disease severity, identify complications, and guide appropriate management decisions.