What is the difference between Albumin 25% and Albumin 5% infusion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Albumin 25% vs Albumin 5% Infusion: Key Differences and Clinical Applications

Albumin 25% is a hyperoncotic solution primarily used for its plasma-expanding effects without significant volume administration, while albumin 5% is iso-oncotic and used when both volume expansion and oncotic pressure increase are needed. 1

Concentration and Oncotic Properties

  • 25% Albumin:

    • Hyperoncotic solution (25g albumin per 100mL)
    • Draws fluid from interstitial to intravascular space
    • Provides 5 times more albumin per volume compared to 5% solution
    • Minimal volume administration (100mL of 25% contains 25g albumin)
    • Indicated when fluid restriction is necessary
  • 5% Albumin:

    • Iso-oncotic solution (5g albumin per 100mL)
    • Similar oncotic pressure to plasma
    • Provides volume expansion without significant fluid shift
    • Larger volume administration (500mL of 5% contains 25g albumin)
    • Used when both volume expansion and albumin replacement are needed

Clinical Applications

25% Albumin Indications

  1. Large-volume paracentesis (>5L):

    • Recommended dose: 8g albumin/L of ascites removed (32mL of 25% solution per liter) 1
    • Prevents post-paracentesis circulatory dysfunction 2
    • Reduces risk of renal impairment, hyponatremia, and mortality 1
  2. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis:

    • Recommended dose: 1.5g/kg on day 1 and 1g/kg on day 3 1
    • Reduces rates of kidney impairment and mortality
  3. Intradialytic hypotension:

    • Particularly in patients with hypoalbuminemia (<30g/L)
    • Superior to saline for maintaining blood pressure and improving ultrafiltration 2, 1
  4. Cerebral edema management:

    • Creates oncotic gradient to withdraw cerebral interstitial fluid 3
    • May reduce intracranial pressure in patients with mild to moderate brain edema

5% Albumin Indications

  1. Volume expansion in hypovolemic states:

    • Used when both volume and albumin replacement are needed
    • Less risk of fluid overload compared to crystalloids in certain patients
  2. Plasma exchange procedures:

    • Replacement fluid during plasmapheresis 4

Administration Considerations

  • Administration rate:

    • 25% albumin: Should not exceed 2mL per minute in patients with hypoproteinemia to avoid circulatory complications and pulmonary edema 1
    • 5% albumin: Can be administered more rapidly when volume expansion is needed
  • Cost implications:

    • Albumin is expensive (approximately $130/25g in US dollars) 1
    • Inappropriate use represents significant healthcare costs (approximately $20,000 per patient annually) 1
    • 25% solution delivers the same amount of albumin in a smaller volume, potentially reducing administration costs

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Avoid routine use for hypoalbuminemia correction:

    • Not recommended for routine correction of low serum albumin without specific indications 1, 4, 5
    • No survival benefit in critically ill patients with hypoalbuminemia without addressing underlying cause
  2. Monitor for volume overload:

    • Exercise caution in patients with heart failure or cardiomyopathy 1
    • 25% solution carries lower risk of volume overload compared to 5% solution
  3. Consider alternatives for volume expansion:

    • Crystalloids are first-line for most volume expansion needs
    • Reserve albumin for specific indications where evidence supports its use
  4. Potential risks with hyperoncotic solutions:

    • Some studies suggest hyperoncotic albumin solutions may worsen AKI in sepsis or shock 6
    • However, overall evidence for this effect is weak

In conclusion, the choice between 25% and 5% albumin should be based on whether the primary goal is to increase oncotic pressure with minimal volume (25%) or to provide both volume expansion and oncotic support (5%). The 25% solution is particularly valuable in situations requiring fluid restriction or targeted oncotic effects, while the 5% solution is more appropriate when volume replacement is also needed.

References

Guideline

Albumin Administration Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.

European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2024

Research

Rationale for albumin infusions.

Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2009

Research

Intravenous Albumin for Mitigating Hypotension and Augmenting Ultrafiltration during Kidney Replacement Therapy.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.