What is the management plan for a patient with low normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function, mild aortic regurgitation, and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 50-55%?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Low Normal Left Ventricular Systolic Function with Mild Aortic Regurgitation

For a patient with low normal left ventricular systolic function (LVEF 50-55%), mild aortic regurgitation, and normal chamber sizes, regular clinical monitoring without immediate surgical intervention is recommended.

Classification and Risk Assessment

The patient's condition can be classified according to the ACC/AHA staging system:

  • Stage B (Progressive AR): Mild aortic regurgitation with normal LV systolic function (though at the lower end of normal) 1
  • Normal chamber sizes (left ventricle, right ventricle, left atrium, and right atrium)
  • LVEF 50-55% (low normal range)

Management Recommendations

Medical Management

  1. Blood Pressure Control

    • Treatment of hypertension (systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg) is recommended (Class I, Level B-NR) 1
    • Goal is to reduce afterload on the left ventricle
  2. Clinical Monitoring

    • Regular clinical follow-up every 1-2 years 2
    • Monitor for development of symptoms (dyspnea, angina, syncope)
    • Assess for changes in exercise tolerance
  3. Echocardiographic Surveillance

    • Repeat echocardiography every 1-2 years 1
    • More frequent monitoring (6-12 months) if borderline LV function or if there are changes in clinical status
    • Pay particular attention to:
      • LVEF trends
      • LV dimensions
      • Progression of AR severity

Surgical Considerations

Surgery is NOT indicated at this time based on:

  • Mild AR severity (not severe) 1
  • Normal LV dimensions
  • Absence of severe LV dysfunction (LVEF >50%)
  • Presumably asymptomatic status

According to the 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines, surgical intervention would only be considered if 1:

  • AR becomes severe AND:
    • Symptoms develop
    • LVEF decreases to ≤55% (currently at borderline)
    • LV becomes severely enlarged (LVESD >50 mm or >25 mm/m²)

Perioperative Considerations (If Non-Cardiac Surgery is Planned)

For patients with mild AR and normal LV systolic function undergoing non-cardiac surgery:

  • It is reasonable to proceed with elective non-cardiac surgery (Class 2a, Level C-LD) 1
  • No special perioperative precautions are required beyond standard monitoring

Special Considerations

Monitoring Parameters

Pay particular attention to these parameters during follow-up:

  • LVEF: Currently at low-normal range (50-55%); monitor for any further decline
  • LV dimensions: Currently normal; watch for progressive dilation
  • AR severity: Currently mild; monitor for progression
  • Symptoms: Development of exertional dyspnea, angina, or heart failure symptoms

Potential Pitfalls

  1. Underestimation of AR Severity

    • Eccentric jets may lead to underestimation of AR severity, particularly with bicuspid valves 2
    • If clinical suspicion exists, consider additional imaging (TEE, CMR)
  2. Borderline LVEF

    • The patient's LVEF is at the lower end of normal (50-55%)
    • This requires closer monitoring than typical mild AR cases
    • Consider more frequent follow-up (6-12 months rather than 1-2 years)
  3. Progressive LV Remodeling

    • Even with mild AR, patients with borderline LV function may experience adverse remodeling over time 3
    • Recent research suggests indexed LV end-systolic volume ≥45 mL/m² is associated with worse outcomes 3

Conclusion

The current management strategy should focus on regular monitoring rather than immediate intervention. The low-normal LVEF (50-55%) warrants slightly closer follow-up than typical mild AR cases, but does not currently meet criteria for surgical intervention according to current guidelines.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Aortic Regurgitation Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Association of Left Ventricular Volume in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Aortic Regurgitation.

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.