What are the key components of an ultrasound (USG) report for a patient with suspected cholelithiasis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Key Components of an Ultrasound Report for Suspected Cholelithiasis

Ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality for suspected cholelithiasis with 96% accuracy for detecting gallstones, and should be the initial diagnostic test for patients with right upper quadrant pain or suspected biliary disease. 1

Essential Components of a Cholelithiasis Ultrasound Report

Gallbladder Assessment

  • Presence or absence of gallstones, including number, size, mobility, and acoustic shadowing 1
  • Differentiation between gallstones, sludge, polyps, or masses 1
  • Gallbladder wall thickness (normal <3mm; thickened wall may suggest cholecystitis) 1
  • Gallbladder size and shape (contracted or distended) 1
  • Presence of sonographic Murphy sign (focal tenderness over the sonographically localized gallbladder) 1
  • Presence of pericholecystic fluid 1

Biliary Tree Evaluation

  • Common bile duct diameter (normal <6mm, or <8-10mm in elderly or post-cholecystectomy patients) 1
  • Presence or absence of intrahepatic biliary dilation 1
  • Direct visualization of common bile duct stones, if present 1
  • Assessment of the pancreaticobiliary junction 1

Liver Assessment

  • Liver parenchyma appearance 1
  • Evidence of cirrhosis or other hepatic pathology 1

Pancreas Assessment

  • Visualization of pancreatic head (when possible) 1
  • Signs of pancreatitis (if present) 1

Special Considerations

For Suspected Acute Cholecystitis

  • Document specific findings suggestive of acute inflammation: 1
    • Gallbladder wall thickening >3mm
    • Pericholecystic fluid
    • Sonographic Murphy sign
    • Gallbladder distension

For Suspected Complicated Cholecystitis

  • Document findings suggestive of complications: 1
    • Intraluminal hyperechoic blood products (hemorrhagic cholecystitis)
    • Intraluminal gas or gas in gallbladder wall (emphysematous cholecystitis)
    • Intraluminal debris or membranes
    • Discontinuity of gallbladder wall (perforation)

For Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones

  • Note that direct visualization of common bile duct stones on ultrasound is a strong predictor of choledocholithiasis 1
  • Document that ultrasound has limitations in detecting small common bile duct stones (sensitivity ranges from 22.5% to 75%) 1, 2
  • Consider recommending additional imaging (MRCP, EUS, or ERCP) if clinical suspicion for choledocholithiasis remains high despite negative ultrasound 2, 3

Technical Considerations

  • Document technical adequacy of the examination 1
  • Note any limitations (e.g., bowel gas, body habitus) 1
  • Include measurements of structures when appropriate 1

Follow-up Recommendations

  • For patients with confirmed gallstones receiving medical therapy (e.g., ursodeoxycholic acid), recommend follow-up ultrasound at 6-month intervals for the first year 4
  • For asymptomatic gallstones, consider recommending observation unless patient falls into a high-risk group 5
  • For suspected common bile duct stones with negative ultrasound but high clinical suspicion, consider recommending additional imaging such as MRCP, EUS, or ERCP 2, 6, 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying solely on sonographic Murphy sign, which has relatively low specificity for acute cholecystitis 1
  • Overlooking small common bile duct stones, which may be missed on ultrasound 2, 3
  • Misinterpreting increased common bile duct diameter as definitive evidence of choledocholithiasis, especially in elderly patients where biliary duct tone may be decreased 1
  • Failing to document technical limitations that may affect diagnostic accuracy 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.