Causes of False Positive NIPT Results
The primary causes of false positive Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) results include confined placental mosaicism, vanishing twin, maternal copy number variations, maternal malignancies, and technical/statistical factors related to testing algorithms. 1
Biological Causes
Placental Factors
- Confined Placental Mosaicism (CPM): The most common biological cause of false positive results. Since NIPT analyzes cell-free DNA primarily derived from placental trophoblasts rather than the fetus itself, chromosomal abnormalities confined to the placenta can lead to discordant results 1, 2
- Fetoplacental Mosaicism: True fetal mosaicism that may be present in varying degrees between the fetus and placenta can cause discrepant results 3
Maternal Factors
- Maternal Copy Number Variations: Maternal genomic variations can be detected in cell-free DNA and misinterpreted as fetal abnormalities 1
- Maternal Mosaicism: Low-level maternal chromosomal mosaicism, particularly involving sex chromosomes, can lead to false positive results 1
- Maternal Malignancy: Multiple or rare aneuploidies (especially autosomal monosomies) detected by NIPT may indicate an underlying maternal malignancy, as tumors can release abnormal DNA into maternal circulation 1
- Maternal Obesity: High maternal weight (>250 lbs) is associated with low fetal fraction, which can increase the risk of test failure or inaccurate results 1
Pregnancy-Related Factors
- Vanishing Twin/Demised Co-twin: DNA from a non-viable twin with chromosomal abnormalities can persist in maternal circulation and lead to false positive results 1
- Empty Second Sac: The presence of a second gestational sac has been associated with false positive results 1
Technical and Statistical Factors
- Low Fetal Fraction: Insufficient fetal DNA in the maternal circulation can lead to unreliable results. This is more common in obese women, with test failure rates of 20% in women >250 lbs and 50% in women >350 lbs 1
- Algorithm Variations: Different testing platforms use different cutoffs, z-scores, and normalization controls, which can lead to inconsistent results 1
- Statistical Limitations: By design, screening algorithms include some false positives to ensure high detection rates of true positives 1
Special Considerations
Multiple Gestations
- Higher failure rates and potentially lower detection rates are observed in twin pregnancies 1
- Limited data is available on NIPT performance in multifetal gestations 1
Microdeletion Testing
- NIPT for microdeletions and smaller copy-number variants has lower positive predictive values (PPVs) compared to common trisomies 1
- False positive rates are higher for rare conditions due to their lower prevalence 1
Clinical Implications
- NIPT is a screening test, not a diagnostic test; positive results require confirmation through invasive diagnostic testing 1
- The positive predictive value (PPV) varies by condition and maternal age - a 35-year-old woman with a positive NIPT result has a higher PPV than a 25-year-old woman 1
- PPV is highest for trisomy 21 (91.8%) and lower for trisomy 18 (65.8%) and trisomy 13 (37.2%) 1
- When multiple or rare aneuploidies are detected, consideration of maternal malignancy may be warranted 1
Follow-up Recommendations
- Diagnostic testing (amniocentesis or CVS) is recommended following any positive NIPT result 1
- For CVS with discordant results, follow-up amniocentesis may be needed to distinguish between confined placental mosaicism and true fetal mosaicism 1
- For cases with unexplained false positive results involving sex chromosomes, maternal karyotyping may be considered to rule out maternal mosaicism 1