Basics of Antiarrhythmic Medication Management
Antiarrhythmic drugs should be selected based primarily on safety considerations rather than efficacy, with treatment tailored to the specific arrhythmia type and underlying cardiac condition. 1
Classification and General Principles
- Antiarrhythmic drugs are classified according to the Vaughan Williams schema (classes I-IV) or the more mechanistic Sicilian Gambit system 1
- Administration route for life-threatening arrhythmias should be intravenous, with a 20 ml saline bolus following peripheral administration to aid delivery to central circulation 1
- Before initiating antiarrhythmic therapy, reversible precipitants of arrhythmias should be identified and corrected (e.g., coronary disease, valvular disease, hypertension, heart failure) 1
- Safety rather than efficacy should primarily guide the choice of antiarrhythmic drug 1
Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias
Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)
- For unstable VT with adverse signs (systolic BP ≤90 mmHg, chest pain, heart failure, rate ≥150 beats/min), immediate synchronized DC cardioversion is recommended 1, 2
- For stable VT:
Ventricular Fibrillation (VF)
- Early defibrillation is the primary treatment; pharmacological therapy is secondary 1
- For refractory VF (after 12 DC shocks with appropriate advanced life support):
Management of Supraventricular Arrhythmias
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
For patients with lone AF (no structural heart disease):
For patients with structural heart disease or heart failure:
For vagally-induced AF:
For adrenergically-mediated AF:
Long-Term Management Considerations
- Antiarrhythmic drug therapy approximately doubles sinus rhythm maintenance compared to no therapy 1
- Beta-blockers are the only antiarrhythmic agents shown to reduce sudden arrhythmic death, especially in patients with prior myocardial infarction or heart failure 1, 5
- When one antiarrhythmic drug fails, a clinically acceptable response may be achieved with another agent 1
- For difficult cases, drug combinations may be effective (e.g., beta-blocker, sotalol, or amiodarone with a class IC agent) 1
Monitoring and Safety Considerations
- Proarrhythmia (drug-induced arrhythmias) is a significant risk with antiarrhythmic drugs 1, 3
- Risk factors for torsades de pointes include: female gender, structural heart disease, prolonged baseline QT interval, bradycardia, hypokalemia, previous proarrhythmic responses, and higher drug plasma levels 6
- Serum potassium levels should be in the normal range before cardioversion 1
- Specific monitoring requirements:
- Amiodarone: Monitor QT interval and TU waves; watch for extracardiac side effects (pulmonary, thyroid, liver) 1
- Flecainide: Plasma level monitoring (therapeutic range 200-500 ng/mL in children) is recommended, especially in patients with renal impairment 7
- Sotalol: QTc monitoring is crucial; serious consideration should be given to reducing dose or discontinuing when QTc exceeds 550 msec 8
Drug-Specific Considerations
- Amiodarone has a very long half-life (up to 100 days), making it less suitable for short-term therapy 1
- When switching from amiodarone to other antiarrhythmics, allow at least 2-4 plasma half-lives to elapse 7
- Flecainide and propafenone can convert AF to atrial flutter with rapid ventricular response; pre-administration of beta-blockers, verapamil, or diltiazem can prevent this 1
- Drug interactions are common with antiarrhythmics:
Special Populations
- In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), antiarrhythmic drugs are often needed to decrease frequency of defibrillator shocks 10
- Sotalol has been shown to be effective in preventing ICD shocks in controlled studies 10
- In children, dosing should be based on body surface area and age, with careful QTc monitoring 8