What are the treatment options for arrhythmias, specifically the use of antiarrhythmic (antiarrhythmic) medications?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Antiarrhythmic Medications for Arrhythmia Treatment

Beta-blockers are the first-line antiarrhythmic therapy for most arrhythmias, as they are effective, generally safe, and the only class proven to reduce sudden cardiac death and improve survival. 1

Treatment Algorithm by Arrhythmia Type

Ventricular Arrhythmias

For symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) in structurally normal hearts:

  • Start with beta-blockers or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, verapamil) as first-line therapy to reduce symptoms and arrhythmia burden 1
  • If beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers are ineffective or not tolerated, escalate to Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) or sotalol for rhythm control 1
  • Avoid Class I antiarrhythmics when possible due to concerns for adverse effects and proarrhythmic risk 1

For ventricular arrhythmias with structural heart disease or heart failure:

  • Beta-blockers remain first-line and are the only antiarrhythmics proven to reduce mortality in post-myocardial infarction and heart failure patients 1
  • Amiodarone or dofetilide are the preferred antiarrhythmics when additional rhythm control is needed, as they have demonstrated neutral effects on survival in controlled trials 1, 2
  • Avoid Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) entirely in patients with structural heart disease due to increased mortality risk 1

Critical caveat for beta-blockers: In acute STEMI/NSTEMI patients with ≥2 shock risk factors (age >70 years, heart rate >110 bpm, systolic BP <120 mmHg), beta-blockers significantly increase risk of shock and death 1

Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

For rate control in new-onset AF:

  • Beta-blockers are first-line for rate control in hemodynamically stable patients 3
  • Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, verapamil) are alternatives for rate control 1, 3
  • Digoxin should not be used as monotherapy in active patients, as it only controls rate at rest and is ineffective during exercise 3
  • For patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, use beta-blockers and/or digoxin, avoiding calcium channel blockers 3

For rhythm control and maintenance of sinus rhythm:

In patients WITHOUT structural heart disease:

  • Flecainide, propafenone, or sotalol are first-line choices for maintaining sinus rhythm 1, 4, 5, 2
  • These agents are well-tolerated with relatively low toxicity risk 1
  • Amiodarone and dofetilide are second-line options when first-line agents fail 1
  • Amiodarone is not appropriate as initial therapy in healthy patients due to significant organ toxicity risks 3, 6

In patients WITH structural heart disease (coronary artery disease, hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy):

  • Sotalol is preferred initially unless heart failure is present 1
  • Amiodarone or dofetilide are secondary choices 1

In patients WITH heart failure:

  • Amiodarone or dofetilide are the only safe options for rhythm control 1, 2, 7
  • All other antiarrhythmics carry unacceptable risks in this population 1

Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)

For acute termination of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia:

  • Adenosine is the drug of choice, given as rapid IV bolus: 3 mg initially, then 6 mg, then 12 mg maximum 1
  • Adenosine has an extremely short half-life and selectively blocks AV nodal conduction 1
  • Contraindicated in asthmatics due to bronchospasm risk 1
  • Must be given in monitored environment as it can cause transient complete heart block 1

For chronic suppression:

  • Propafenone is indicated for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia with disabling symptoms 4

Ventricular Tachycardia with Hemodynamic Compromise

For sustained VT causing hemodynamic instability:

  • Lignocaine (lidocaine) is first-choice: 1-3 mg/kg IV bolus (100 mg for cardiac arrest), may repeat after 5-10 minutes 1
  • Maintain with 2-4 mg/min infusion if successful 1
  • Amiodarone is second-line: 5 mg/kg (300 mg) over 1 hour, or over 15 minutes in life-threatening situations 1
  • Bretylium (5-10 mg/kg) for refractory VT unresponsive to other agents, but antiarrhythmic effect may take 20 minutes 1

Critical Safety Considerations

Proarrhythmic risks:

  • All antiarrhythmics except beta-blockers can worsen the index arrhythmia 2, 8
  • Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) are absolutely contraindicated in structural heart disease 1, 5
  • QT prolongation and torsades de pointes risk with amiodarone, sotalol, and dofetilide 6

Drug interactions with amiodarone:

  • Increases warfarin effect by 100% within 3-4 days; reduce warfarin dose by one-third to one-half 6
  • Increases digoxin levels by 70% after one day; reduce digoxin dose by 50% or discontinue 6
  • Increases quinidine levels by 33% and procainamide by 55%; reduce doses by one-third 6
  • Grapefruit juice increases amiodarone levels by 50% and should be avoided 6

Electrolyte management:

  • Maintain potassium >4.5 mmol/L before cardioversion or when using antiarrhythmics 1
  • Correct hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia to prevent proarrhythmia 1

Contraindications:

  • Cardioversion is contraindicated in digitalis toxicity due to risk of refractory ventricular arrhythmias 1
  • Assess for sinus node dysfunction before cardioversion in long-standing AF 1

Monitoring Requirements

  • Amiodarone requires close monitoring for organ toxicity with long-term use due to 100-day half-life 1, 6
  • Flecainide has 12-27 hour half-life; overdose supportive treatments may need extended duration 5
  • Dofetilide requires in-hospital initiation with continuous monitoring 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Antiarrhythmic Drugs.

Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2004

Guideline

Initial Management of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Antiarrhythmic treatment: an overview.

The American journal of cardiology, 1984

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.