Initial Management of Small Hill-Sachs Lesion of the Shoulder
Conservative management is the initial approach for small Hill-Sachs lesions of the shoulder that are non-engaging and do not cause instability. 1, 2
Diagnostic Workup
- Initial evaluation should include standard shoulder radiographs with three views: anteroposterior (AP) views in internal and external rotation, and an axillary or scapula-Y view 1
- The Stryker notch view is specifically recommended to evaluate Hill-Sachs lesions 1
- Radiographs should be performed upright as malalignment can be underrepresented on supine imaging 1
- MR arthrography is the preferred advanced imaging for evaluating Hill-Sachs lesions when further characterization is needed, as it can assess both bony and cartilaginous components 1
- CT without contrast can be used to assess bony defects when MRI is contraindicated, though it has limitations in evaluating cartilaginous Hill-Sachs lesions 1
Treatment Algorithm
For Small, Non-engaging Hill-Sachs Lesions:
Initial Conservative Management:
Monitoring:
Factors That May Warrant Surgical Consideration:
- Presence of engaging Hill-Sachs lesion (lesion that engages the anterior glenoid with the shoulder in abduction and external rotation) 3
- Concomitant significant glenoid bone loss creating an "inverted-pear" glenoid 3
- Recurrent instability despite conservative management 2, 3
- High-demand athletes, especially contact sport participants 3
Important Considerations
- The incidence of Hill-Sachs lesions approaches 100% in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability 2
- Identification of concomitant glenoid bone loss is essential as this creates a bipolar injury pattern that may require different management 2
- Small, non-engaging Hill-Sachs lesions in stable shoulders have good outcomes with conservative management 2
- Surgical management should be considered when there is objective evidence of shoulder instability during desired activities 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Inadequate imaging leading to missed diagnosis or underestimation of lesion size 1
- Failure to assess for associated soft tissue injuries (Bankart tears, labral or capsular injuries) 2
- Overlooking the presence of glenoid bone loss, which significantly affects treatment decisions and outcomes 2, 3
- Inappropriate surgical intervention for small, non-engaging lesions that could be managed conservatively 2
Emerging Techniques
- Minimally invasive balloon reduction techniques are being investigated for acute Hill-Sachs lesions, though these remain experimental 4
- For larger or engaging lesions requiring surgery, the "remplissage" technique (arthroscopic capsulotenodesis of the posterior capsule and infraspinatus tendon to fill the Hill-Sachs lesion) may be considered 5