Recommended Initial Treatment Regimens for HIV Infection
For initial HIV treatment, integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI)-based regimens are optimal, specifically dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine, dolutegravir plus tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/emtricitabine, elvitegravir/cobicistat/TAF/emtricitabine, or raltegravir plus TAF/emtricitabine. 1
Core Principles of Initial HIV Therapy
- ART is recommended for all HIV-infected individuals with detectable plasma virus, regardless of CD4 cell count, to reduce morbidity and mortality 1
- Initial therapy typically consists of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus a third active drug from a different class, usually an InSTI 1
- Treatment should be initiated as soon as possible after diagnosis, with some centers implementing same-day ART initiation 1
- Baseline resistance testing is recommended before starting therapy, though treatment may begin before results are available in some cases 1
Recommended First-Line Regimens
InSTI-Based Regimens (Preferred)
InSTI-based regimens are recommended as first-line therapy due to:
- Higher rates of virologic suppression compared to other regimens 1
- Minimal toxicity and fewer side effects 1
- Lower risk of drug interactions (particularly with dolutegravir and bictegravir) 1
- Higher barrier to resistance (especially dolutegravir) 1
The recommended InSTI-based regimens are:
Dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (evidence rating AIa) 1
Dolutegravir plus TAF/emtricitabine (evidence rating AIa) 1
- Good option for patients with or at risk for renal or bone disease 1
Elvitegravir/cobicistat/TAF/emtricitabine (evidence rating AIa) 1
- Note that cobicistat is a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, resulting in more drug interactions than other InSTIs 1
Raltegravir plus TAF/emtricitabine (evidence rating AIII) 1
- Higher pill burden (≥3 pills per day) and lower barrier to resistance than dolutegravir 1
Alternative Regimens (When InSTIs are not an option)
If InSTI-based therapy is not possible, the following regimens are recommended:
- Darunavir (boosted) plus TAF (or TDF)/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine (evidence rating AIa) 1
- Efavirenz/TDF/emtricitabine (evidence rating AIa) 1
- Rilpivirine/TAF (or TDF)/emtricitabine (evidence rating AIa) 1
Important Considerations for Regimen Selection
NRTI Backbone Selection
TAF vs TDF: TAF has fewer renal and bone toxicities compared to TDF, especially when used with pharmacological boosters 1
Abacavir considerations:
Special Populations
Patients with high viral load or low CD4 count: For patients with >100,000 HIV RNA copies/mL or <200 CD4 cells/μL, regimen potency is particularly important as some combinations have suboptimal virologic suppression in this setting 1
Patients with comorbidities:
Monitoring and Follow-up
- Regular viral load monitoring is essential to identify treatment failures early and minimize resistance development 1
- Monitor for drug-specific toxicities, particularly during the first few months of therapy 1
- Assess adherence at each visit, as this is critical for treatment success 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Not testing for HLA-B*5701 before prescribing abacavir-containing regimens 1
- Overlooking drug interactions, particularly with cobicistat-boosted regimens 1
- Delaying ART initiation - early treatment is associated with better outcomes 1
- Using single-agent therapy when modifying a failing regimen, which can lead to resistance 1
- Not considering comorbidities when selecting initial therapy 1