Understanding Number Needed to Treat (NNT) of 6
A Number Needed to Treat (NNT) of 6 means that you need to treat 6 patients with the intervention to prevent one additional adverse outcome (or achieve one additional beneficial outcome) compared to the control or standard treatment.
What NNT Measures
- NNT is calculated as the inverse of the absolute risk reduction (ARR): NNT = 1/ARR × 100 1
- When ARR = 16.67%, the NNT equals 6 (1/0.1667 = 6) 1
- NNT represents the average number of patients who need to receive the experimental therapy to prevent one additional adverse outcome (or achieve one beneficial outcome) compared to the control therapy 2
Clinical Interpretation of NNT = 6
- An NNT of 6 is generally considered a clinically meaningful effect size in medical practice 3
- This means that for every 6 patients treated with the intervention:
- 1 patient will benefit (achieve the desired outcome or avoid the adverse outcome)
- The other 5 patients would have the same outcome whether they received the intervention or control 1
Contextualizing NNT Values
- Lower NNT values indicate more effective treatments (fewer patients needed to treat for one to benefit) 3
- For comparison:
- Evolocumab (Repatha) has an NNT of 67 over 2.2 years to prevent one major cardiovascular event in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease 4
- Ezetimibe plus simvastatin shows an NNT of 50 over 6 years for secondary prevention 4
- An NNT of 6 is substantially better than these examples, indicating a more effective intervention 1, 4
Clinical Decision-Making with NNT
NNT should be considered alongside:
The threshold NNT (the point at which benefits equal negative consequences) can be calculated as: NNT(T) = 1/(AER₁·RV₁ +...+ AERₙ·RVₙ), where AER is the adverse event rate and RV is the relative value 5
Important Considerations When Interpreting NNT
NNT values are specific to:
Measurement errors in continuous outcome measures can lead to bias in NNT calculations 7
Always check if the NNT is statistically significant - non-significant NNTs should be reported as "NS" rather than a numerical value 1
Common Pitfalls in NNT Interpretation
- Failing to consider the time period over which the NNT applies (a 5-year NNT of 6 is different from a 1-year NNT of 6) 1
- Not accounting for the severity of the outcome being prevented (an NNT of 6 to prevent death is more meaningful than an NNT of 6 to prevent mild symptoms) 5
- Overlooking the baseline risk in the population (NNT is more favorable in higher-risk populations) 5, 6
- Not considering adverse effects of treatment when evaluating the clinical utility of an NNT 5