What are the guidelines for the VRD (bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen in treating multiple myeloma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

VRD Guidelines for Multiple Myeloma

VRD (bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) is a category 1, preferred regimen for multiple myeloma treatment, particularly as induction therapy for transplant-eligible patients, offering superior progression-free and overall survival compared to doublet regimens. 1

Standard VRD Dosing Regimen

The standard VRD regimen consists of:

  • Bortezomib: 1.3 mg/m² subcutaneously on days 1,8,15 1
  • Lenalidomide: 25 mg orally on days 1-14 1
  • Dexamethasone: 20 mg on day of and day after bortezomib (or 40 mg on days 1,8,15,22) 1
  • Cycle repeats every 3 weeks 1

Clinical Evidence Supporting VRD

Efficacy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

  • The SWOG S0777 trial demonstrated significantly improved outcomes with VRD compared to Rd (lenalidomide-dexamethasone) alone: 1, 2

    • Median progression-free survival: 43 months vs 30 months (HR 0.712)
    • Median overall survival: 75 months vs 64 months (HR 0.709)
    • With longer follow-up (median 84 months), PFS benefit maintained (41 vs 29 months) 1
  • Response rates with VRD induction: 3

    • Overall response rate: 97.1%
    • Very good partial response or better: 89.9% after transplantation
    • Stringent complete response: 33.3% after transplantation

VRD vs Other Regimens

  • The ENDURANCE trial compared VRD to KRd (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) in standard-risk patients: 1, 4
    • Similar PFS: 34.4 months (VRD) vs 34.6 months (KRd)
    • VGPR or better: 65% (VRD) vs 74% (KRd)
    • VRD had more peripheral neuropathy but fewer cardiac, pulmonary, and renal toxicities 1

Modified VRD Regimens

VRD-lite for Elderly/Frail Patients

For patients who may not tolerate standard VRD, a modified "VRD-lite" regimen can be considered: 1, 5

  • Bortezomib: 1.3 mg/m² subcutaneously on days 1,8,15, and 22 1

  • Lenalidomide: 15 mg orally on days 1-21 (omitted on days 1,8,15 - days of bortezomib) 1, 5

  • Dexamethasone: 20 mg on day of and day after bortezomib 1, 5

  • 35-day cycle 5

  • Efficacy of VRD-lite: 5

    • Overall response rate: 86%
    • VGPR or better: 66%
    • Median PFS: 35.1 months

Treatment Duration and Sequencing

  • For transplant-eligible patients: 1

    • Four to six courses of VRD induction are recommended before proceeding to stem cell collection
    • VRD is widely used in the United States and becoming standard of care in Europe
  • For transplant-ineligible patients: 1

    • VRD followed by maintenance therapy with lenalidomide/dexamethasone until progression or unacceptable toxicity

Special Considerations

High-Risk vs Standard-Risk Disease

  • VRD shows differential outcomes based on risk stratification: 3

    • Standard-risk patients: median PFS 76.5 months; 10-year OS 58%
    • High-risk patients: median PFS 40.3 months; 10-year OS 29%
  • In high-risk patients, VMP (bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone) may have advantages over Rd-R (lenalidomide, dexamethasone followed by lenalidomide maintenance) 6

Renal Insufficiency

  • For patients with acute renal insufficiency, bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone (CyBorD) may be preferred initially 1
  • Consider switching to VRD after renal function improves 1

Common Adverse Events and Management

  • Peripheral neuropathy: more common with bortezomib (24% grade 3 with IV administration vs 5% without bortezomib) 1

    • Use subcutaneous rather than IV administration of bortezomib to reduce neuropathy risk 1
    • Consider dose reduction or schedule modification if neuropathy develops
  • Thromboembolic events:

    • Prophylactic anticoagulation recommended with lenalidomide-containing regimens
  • Fatigue, hyperglycemia, and diarrhea are other common adverse events 4

Monitoring Response

  • Response assessment should follow International Myeloma Working Group criteria 1
  • Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment increasingly important for evaluating depth of response 1

VRD represents a highly effective standard of care for multiple myeloma treatment, with robust evidence supporting its use in both transplant-eligible and ineligible patients.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.