Tranexamic Acid for Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Tranexamic acid (TXA) should not be used for gastrointestinal bleeding due to lack of mortality benefit and increased risk of thromboembolic events. 1
Efficacy Evidence
High-dose intravenous TXA (1g loading dose followed by 3g over 24 hours) shows no benefit in reducing mortality (RR 0.98,95% CI 0.88-1.09) or rebleeding rates (RR 0.92,95% CI 0.82-1.04) in gastrointestinal bleeding based on high-certainty evidence from the HALT-IT trial 2
Extended-use high-dose IV TXA increases the risk of thromboembolic events:
The American College of Gastroenterology does not recommend TXA for gastrointestinal bleeding due to lack of benefit and increased thrombotic risk 1
Contrasting Evidence
Some older, smaller studies suggested potential benefits:
- Low-dose IV or enteral TXA showed potential reduction in rebleeding (RR 0.5,95% CI 0.33-0.75) and decreased need for surgical intervention (RR 0.58,95% CI 0.38-0.88) with moderate certainty evidence 3
A 2021 meta-analysis suggested TXA reduced continued bleeding (RR 0.60,95% CI 0.43-0.84) and mortality (RR 0.60,95% CI 0.45-0.80) compared to placebo 4
However, these findings have been superseded by the larger, more recent HALT-IT trial which had superior methodology and included 12,009 patients 2
Special Considerations
The European Association for the Study of the Liver specifically recommends against using TXA in patients with cirrhosis and active variceal bleeding (strong recommendation) 1
The British Society of Gastroenterology suggests that use of TXA in acute lower GI bleeding should be confined to clinical trials only 1
For variceal bleeding, standard therapy with vasoactive drugs, antibiotics, and endoscopic band ligation should be used instead 1
Clinical Approach to GI Bleeding
Standard management should be prioritized:
TXA should not be used routinely in the management of GI bleeding due to:
While TXA has shown benefits in trauma and surgical bleeding 5, this does not translate to GI bleeding, highlighting the importance of disease-specific evidence rather than extrapolating from other clinical scenarios 1, 2