Can infective endocarditis be detected on a Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) scan?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of PET/CT in Detecting Infective Endocarditis

Yes, infective endocarditis can be detected on PET/CT scans, particularly in cases involving prosthetic valves or cardiac implantable electronic devices, but it has limited sensitivity for native valve endocarditis. 1

Diagnostic Performance of PET/CT in Infective Endocarditis

Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis (PVE)

  • FDG-PET/CT demonstrates high diagnostic value for prosthetic valve endocarditis with sensitivity ranging from 73% to 100% and specificity of 71% to 100% 1
  • Adding FDG-PET/CT findings as an additional major criterion to the modified Duke Criteria significantly increases diagnostic sensitivity from 52-70% to 91-97% without compromising specificity 1
  • FDG-PET/CT can detect peri-prosthetic abscesses in cases where transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were normal or equivocal 1
  • PET/CT can diagnose PVE earlier than TEE and CT angiography before anatomical damage occurs and even earlier than surgical exploration 1

Native Valve Endocarditis (NVE)

  • FDG-PET/CT has poor sensitivity (as low as 22%) for native valve endocarditis, limiting its utility in these cases 2
  • One retrospective study showed 0% sensitivity for diagnosing native valve endocarditis when compared with the modified Duke criteria 1
  • Absence of intracardiac lesions on FDG-PET/CT cannot rule out native valve endocarditis 3

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Infections

  • For CIED infection evaluation, FDG-PET/CT has a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 94%, respectively 1
  • PET/CT shows high sensitivity for pocket infections but lower sensitivity for lead infections 3
  • Several single-center studies have demonstrated promising results in identifying CIED infections using FDG-PET/CT with sensitivities ranging from 60% to 100% and specificities from 86% to 100% 1

Additional Benefits of PET/CT in Infective Endocarditis

  • FDG-PET/CT can detect clinically unsuspected sites of extracardiac infection in up to 24% of cases 1
  • As a whole-body scan, PET/CT can identify unexpected infectious foci outside the heart/chest that may change clinical management 1
  • Can detect septic emboli, which is critical for patient management, especially in prosthetic valve endocarditis 1

Limitations and Technical Considerations

  • Differentiation between device infection and nonspecific inflammation can be achieved based on FDG uptake pattern: focal in infection versus homogeneous in inflammation 1
  • False negatives may occur if PET/CT is performed after antibiotic therapy (≥48 hours) has been initiated 4
  • Patient preparation and image interpretation methods significantly affect diagnostic accuracy 5
  • Abnormal FDG uptake seen on attenuation-corrected PET images should be confirmed on non-attenuation-corrected PET images to avoid potential artifacts from metallic devices 1

Comparison with Other Imaging Modalities

  • Echocardiography (TTE and TEE) remains the first-line imaging test in suspected endocarditis 1
  • When echocardiography is inconclusive in suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis, white blood cell (WBC) scans have lower sensitivity (64%) but higher specificity (100%) compared to FDG-PET/CT (sensitivity 93%, specificity 71%) 6
  • CT may be superior to echocardiography in detecting and visualizing the full extent of paravalvular abscess, pseudoaneurysm, or fistula, particularly in patients with prosthetic valves 1

Clinical Recommendations

  • For suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis or CIED infections, FDG-PET/CT should be considered when echocardiography results are inconclusive 1
  • FDG-PET/CT is particularly valuable for cases classified as "possible" endocarditis by the modified Duke criteria, helping to reclassify them as "definite" diagnosis 1
  • For native valve endocarditis, PET/CT should only be considered as a complementary diagnostic tool with recognition of its limited sensitivity 2
  • When performing PET/CT, optimal timing during clinical workup and standardized protocols for patient preparation, scan acquisition, and image interpretation are essential 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.