What type of X-ray (X-radiation) is best for examining suspected calcification of the heel, close to the ankle?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Best X-ray Views for Examining Suspected Heel Calcification Near the Ankle

For suspected calcification of the heel near the ankle, standard radiographic views should include anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and mortise views of the ankle, with the addition of an axial Harris-Beath view specifically for evaluating the calcaneus.

Standard Radiographic Protocol

  • Standard ankle radiographs should include three views: anteroposterior, lateral, and mortise views 1
  • These standard views provide sufficient radiographic evaluation of the osseous anatomy in the ankle region 1
  • Weight-bearing radiographs are preferred when possible, as they may detect dynamic abnormalities such as joint mal-alignment that may not be apparent on non-weight-bearing radiographs 1

Specialized Views for Heel/Calcaneal Evaluation

  • Axial Harris-Beath view: This specialized view is specifically recommended for suspected calcaneal pathology and is optimal for evaluating calcifications in the heel 1
  • The axial Harris-Beath view is particularly valuable for determining intra-articular extent of calcaneal abnormalities 1
  • For complete evaluation of the hindfoot, the standard three views should be supplemented with this specialized calcaneal projection 1

Additional Considerations

  • If the patient has diabetes and Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy is suspected, bilateral plain X-rays should be performed if possible 1
  • Standing (weight-bearing) radiographs provide important information about stability and alignment that may be relevant to heel pathology 1
  • If the patient cannot bear weight, non-weight-bearing radiographs are an acceptable alternative, though they may not demonstrate all malalignments 1

When Standard Radiographs Are Insufficient

  • If standard radiographs including the axial Harris-Beath view are normal but clinical suspicion remains high, advanced imaging may be warranted 1
  • MRI would be the next best examination if radiographs are normal but symptoms persist, as it can evaluate both osseous and soft tissue structures 1
  • CT may be considered if MRI is unavailable or contraindicated, particularly for detailed evaluation of complex bony architecture 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failing to include the axial Harris-Beath view when calcaneal pathology is suspected can lead to missed diagnoses 1
  • Using only standard AP and lateral views without specialized calcaneal projections may be insufficient for complete evaluation of heel calcifications 1
  • Not obtaining weight-bearing views when possible may miss dynamic abnormalities that contribute to the patient's symptoms 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.