At what Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score is depression considered significant?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Significance of PHQ-9 Score for Depression

A PHQ-9 score of 8 or higher is considered significant for depression, based on validated studies in clinical populations. 1

PHQ-9 Scoring and Clinical Significance

The PHQ-9 is a validated 9-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the presence and severity of depression symptoms according to DSM-IV criteria. The interpretation of scores follows a structured approach:

  • Score 1-7: None/mild depressive symptomatology 1

    • Indicates minimal symptoms of depression
    • Patients typically have effective coping skills and access to social support
  • Score 8-14: Moderate depressive symptomatology 1

    • Represents clinically significant depression requiring attention
    • Indicates subthreshold depressive symptoms
    • Functional impairment ranges from mild to moderate
    • Consultation with psychology or psychiatry is recommended for diagnostic determination
  • Score 15-19: Moderate to severe depressive symptomatology 1, 2

    • Indicates presence of most depressive symptoms
    • Symptoms interfere moderately to markedly with functioning
    • Referral to psychology and/or psychiatry for diagnosis and treatment is recommended
  • Score 20-27: Severe depressive symptomatology 1, 2

    • Indicates severe depression requiring immediate intervention
    • Significant functional impairment is present

Evidence Supporting the Cutoff Score

The American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline specifically recommends a cutoff score of 8 based on diagnostic accuracy studies with cancer outpatients, supported by meta-analysis data from Manea et al. 1

While the traditional cutoff for the PHQ-9 was originally set at 10 in general populations 2, more recent evidence supports the lower threshold of 8 for improved sensitivity in detecting clinically significant depression 1.

Special Considerations

  • Self-harm assessment: One of the PHQ-9 items assesses thoughts of self-harm. For patients with moderate to severe depression, such thoughts are not uncommon. The frequency and specificity of these thoughts are most important for risk assessment. 1

  • Screening approach: A phased screening approach is recommended:

    • First: Identify presence/absence of pertinent history or risk factors
    • Second: Screen with the first two items of PHQ-9 (anhedonia and depressed mood)
    • Third: Complete full PHQ-9 if either of the first two items scores ≥2 1
  • Clinical context: When interpreting PHQ-9 scores, consider:

    • Duration of symptoms
    • Associated sociodemographic factors
    • Psychiatric or health comorbidities
    • Social impairments 1
  • Cultural sensitivity: Use culturally sensitive assessments when possible and tailor assessment for those with learning disabilities or cognitive impairments 1

Clinical Implications

For patients with a PHQ-9 score ≥8:

  • Evaluate for functional impairment 1
  • Consider consultation with psychology or psychiatry for diagnostic confirmation 1
  • Assess for risk of self-harm, particularly with higher scores 1
  • For scores ≥15, referral to psychology and/or psychiatry for diagnosis and treatment is strongly recommended 1

The PHQ-9 has demonstrated strong construct validity, with scores correlating well with other depression measures (r=0.73 with BDI) and showing good sensitivity to change over time, making it valuable for both initial assessment and monitoring treatment response. 3, 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.