Diagnostic Approach for Cholecystitis
The diagnosis of cholecystitis requires a combination of detailed history, complete clinical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging investigations, as no single clinical or laboratory finding has sufficient diagnostic power to establish or exclude the diagnosis. 1, 2
Clinical Evaluation
- Right upper quadrant pain or tenderness is a key clinical feature but has limited diagnostic value alone (negative LR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-1.1) 1
- Murphy's sign (pain on inspiration during palpation of the right upper quadrant) is the most useful clinical finding (positive LR 2.8; 95% CI 0.8-8.6) but still insufficient for definitive diagnosis 1, 3
- Fever, nausea, vomiting, and food intolerance are common symptoms that should raise suspicion 1, 2
- No single clinical finding has sufficient diagnostic power to rule in or rule out cholecystitis 1, 3, 4
Laboratory Testing
- Elevated white blood cell count suggests inflammation but is not specific for cholecystitis 1, 2
- Elevated C-reactive protein is a useful inflammatory marker 1, 2
- Liver function tests may be elevated but have limited specificity; neutrophil count has been shown to have 70% sensitivity and 65.8% specificity 1, 2
- Elevated bilirubin has high specificity (93%) but low sensitivity (40%) 5
Imaging Studies
- Abdominal ultrasound should be performed as the first-line imaging test in all patients with suspected cholecystitis, with a sensitivity of approximately 81% and specificity of 83% 2, 4, 5
- Ultrasound findings to look for include gallstones, gallbladder wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, and sonographic Murphy's sign 2, 4
- If ultrasound results are equivocal, hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan is recommended as the second-line imaging test, with the highest sensitivity (97%) and specificity (90%) for cholecystitis 2, 4
- MRI may be considered in patients with equivocal ultrasound findings or to better visualize hepatic and biliary abnormalities 2, 6
- CT scan has a limited role in primary diagnosis of cholecystitis but may be useful for evaluating complications or for surgical planning 2, 6
Diagnostic Algorithm
Initial assessment:
Imaging:
Diagnosis confirmation:
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Relying on a single clinical or laboratory finding can lead to misdiagnosis 1, 3
- The accuracy of the Tokyo Guidelines criteria has been questioned, with one study showing only 60.3% overall accuracy 1
- Acalculous cholecystitis (without gallstones) accounts for 5-10% of cases and may be more difficult to diagnose 4
- Elderly patients may present with atypical symptoms, making diagnosis more challenging 4
- Delayed diagnosis can lead to increased morbidity and mortality due to complications such as perforation, abscess formation, or sepsis 6, 4