What are the recommended initial energy settings in joules (J) for cardioversion in atrial fibrillation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended Energy Settings for Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation

For atrial fibrillation cardioversion, an initial energy of 200 J or greater is recommended when using monophasic waveforms, while 200 J is recommended for biphasic waveforms, particularly for patients with AF of long duration. 1

Initial Energy Settings Based on Waveform Type

Monophasic Waveform

  • Initial energy should be at least 200 J for atrial fibrillation 1
  • Energy should be increased successively in increments of 100 J until a maximum of 400 J is reached 1
  • Higher initial energy (360 J) has shown significantly better immediate success rates (95%) compared to lower energies (14% with 100 J, 39% with 200 J) 1

Biphasic Waveform

  • Initial energy of 200 J is recommended, particularly for patients with AF of long duration 1
  • Lower energies are generally required compared to monophasic waveforms 1
  • Median successful energy level is typically 100 J with biphasic waveform compared to 200 J with monophasic waveform 1
  • For atrial flutter, initial energy may be lower (50 J) 1

Energy Recommendations Based on Arrhythmia Type and Duration

Atrial Fibrillation

  • For AF ≤2 days duration: Initial energy of 100 J with biphasic waveform may be sufficient 2
  • For AF >2 days duration: Initial energy of 150-200 J with biphasic waveform is recommended 2, 3
  • Recent research suggests that maximum-fixed energy shocks (360 J) achieve higher first-shock success rates (75%) compared to low-escalating energy protocols (34%) 4

Atrial Flutter/Atrial Tachycardia

  • Initial energy of 50 J is often sufficient for atrial flutter 1, 2
  • However, starting with 100 J for atrial flutter has shown higher first-shock conversion rates (85% vs 70%) and less induction of atrial fibrillation (2% vs 11%) compared to 50 J 5

Procedural Considerations

  • Allow at least 1 minute between consecutive shocks to avoid myocardial damage 1
  • Synchronize the shock with the QRS complex to avoid shock delivery during the relative refractory period 1
  • Select an ECG lead that clearly displays both R waves (for synchronization) and P waves (to assess outcome) 1
  • Consider anterior-posterior paddle position, which has shown greater overall success (87%) compared to anterior-lateral position (76%) 1

Special Populations

Patients with Implanted Devices

  • Position paddles as far as possible from implanted devices, preferably in anterior-posterior configuration 1
  • Interrogate and potentially reprogram the device before and after cardioversion 1
  • The risk of exit block is highest when one paddle is positioned near the impulse generator and the other over the cardiac apex 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Starting with too low energy (100 J) for atrial fibrillation with monophasic waveform, which has shown only 14% success rate 1
  • Not allowing sufficient time between shocks (at least 1 minute recommended) 1
  • Improper paddle placement, particularly in patients with implanted devices 1
  • Failure to synchronize the shock with the QRS complex, which could induce ventricular fibrillation 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.