Typical Calcium Levels in Multiple Myeloma
Hypercalcemia in multiple myeloma is defined as a corrected serum calcium level greater than 11.5 mg/dL (2.9 mmol/L) and is considered a defining diagnostic criterion for the disease.1
Diagnostic Criteria and Calcium Levels
- Hypercalcemia is one of the four CRAB criteria (hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, bone lesions) used to diagnose symptomatic multiple myeloma requiring treatment 1
- The threshold for hypercalcemia in multiple myeloma is defined as:
Prevalence and Clinical Significance
- Approximately 19.5-23.1% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients present with hypercalcemia at diagnosis 2, 3
- Hypercalcemia remains an adverse prognostic factor even in the era of novel antimyeloma therapies 2
- Patients with hypercalcemia have:
Measurement Considerations
- Corrected calcium measurements should be used rather than total calcium, as multiple myeloma patients often have low albumin levels 3
- However, there are important caveats regarding calcium measurement in multiple myeloma:
- Ionized calcium may be more accurate than corrected calcium for detecting true hypercalcemia in multiple myeloma patients 4
- Sensitivity of corrected calcium in identifying hypercalcemia (defined by elevated ionized calcium) is only 36% in multiple myeloma patients compared to 76% in other cancer patients 4
- Paraproteins in multiple myeloma may bind calcium, potentially causing pseudohypercalcemia in some cases 5
Disease Progression and Calcium Levels
- Development of hypercalcemia (>11.5 mg/dL) not attributable to other causes is considered a criterion for disease progression in multiple myeloma 1
- Hypercalcemia is often associated with other poor prognostic features:
Clinical Pitfalls
- Be aware of pseudohypercalcemia, a rare phenomenon where total calcium is elevated but ionized calcium remains normal due to binding of calcium to abnormal immunoglobulins 5
- When pseudohypercalcemia is suspected (elevated calcium without typical symptoms), measuring ionized calcium is recommended to avoid unnecessary and potentially toxic treatments 5, 4
- Corrected calcium levels better reflect disease severity than uncorrected levels and should be used for prognostic assessment 3