PRP Protocol for Facial Rejuvenation and Post-Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIH)
For facial rejuvenation, PRP should be administered through intradermal injections at 2-4 week intervals for 3-6 sessions, while for PIH, chemical peeling with TCA 3.75% and lactic acid 15% is more effective than PRP therapy. 1
PRP for Facial Rejuvenation
Preparation Protocol
- Collect autologous blood and centrifuge to obtain platelet-rich plasma with 4-7 times baseline concentration of platelets 2
- Standard centrifugation protocols vary but typically involve:
Administration Methods
Intradermal Injection Technique:
Microneedling with PRP:
Treatment Schedule
- Standard Protocol:
Expected Outcomes
- Facial rejuvenation benefits include:
PRP for Post-Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIH)
Important Caution
- PRP is NOT recommended as first-line treatment for PIH 1, 4
- Chemical peeling shows significantly better results than PRP for PIH 1
- Some studies report PRP may actually increase pigmentation in certain cases 4
Alternative Recommended Approach for PIH
- Chemical peeling with TCA 3.75% and lactic acid 15% shows excellent improvement in 38% of cases compared to only 4.8% with PRP 1
- For patients seeking PRP despite these limitations:
Enhanced Protocols and Combinations
PRP + Hyaluronic Acid
- Combining PRP with hyaluronic acid (HA) shows superior results compared to PRP alone 3
- Cellular matrix (PRP+HA) group showed 20-24% improvement in facial appearance compared to 9-12% with PRP alone 3
- Significantly improved skin elasticity compared to PRP monotherapy 2
PRP + Other Modalities
- PRF (Platelet-Rich Fibrin) shows promising results for periorbital rejuvenation 3
- Nanofat plus PRF demonstrates higher satisfaction rates and improved facial texture compared to traditional approaches 3
- Combined therapy with home care regimens improves cutaneous spots, wrinkles, and texture after 8 weeks 3
Precautions and Limitations
- Avoid PRP for active PIH as it may worsen hyperpigmentation 4
- Warn patients about potential bruising and swelling, especially in periorbital areas 3
- Limited high-quality evidence exists for PRP in facial rejuvenation; most studies show low to critically low confidence in results 5
- Results may vary based on patient age, BMI, and skin condition 2
- For periorbital areas, plasma gel may be more effective than conventional PRP 3
Clinical Pearls
- Assess patient expectations before treatment; results develop gradually over weeks to months 1
- Document baseline with standardized photography for objective assessment 3
- Biometric measurements provide more accurate assessment of subtle changes than visual assessment alone 2
- Patients with lower BMI may respond better to PRP+HA combinations for skin elasticity 2
- Older patients (50s-60s) may see better improvement in skin firmness with combination therapies 2