Are all continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) the same?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Not All Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs) Are the Same

Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) differ significantly in their technology, features, accuracy, and clinical applications. Different CGM systems have varying monitoring principles, accuracy levels, and features that make them distinct from one another 1.

Types of CGM Systems

  • There are three main types of CGM devices 1:

    • Real-time CGM (rtCGM): Systems that measure and display glucose levels continuously
    • Intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM): Systems that measure glucose continuously but require scanning for visualization and storage of values
    • Professional CGM: Clinic-based devices placed on patients for a discrete period (typically 7-14 days) for assessment of glycemic patterns
  • CGM technology can also be categorized as 1:

    • Retrospective CGM: "Holter-style" monitoring where results are obtained after completion of monitoring period
    • Real-time CGM: Provides immediate glucose readings with alarms and predictive alerts

Technical Differences Between CGM Systems

  • Most glucose sensors are designed based on electrochemical principles, with the sensor implanted in subcutaneous tissue 1:

    • The sensor uses an enzyme (typically glucose oxidase) that interacts with interstitial fluid glucose to generate electrical signals
    • These signals are converted into glucose concentrations through specific algorithms 1
  • Sensor types vary between disposable (rtCGM and isCGM) or implantable (rtCGM) 1

  • Accuracy varies substantially between different CGM systems 2, 3:

    • In a head-to-head comparison study, FreeStyle Libre 3 showed significantly lower Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) compared to Dexcom G7 (8.9% vs 13.6%) 2
    • In another comparative study, the Navigator outperformed other devices with an aggregate MARD of 11.8% compared to 16.5% for Seven Plus and 20.3% for Guardian 3

Clinical Applications and Limitations

  • CGM systems have different approval statuses for clinical decision-making 1:

    • Some systems require confirmatory blood glucose checks before treatment decisions
    • Only certain systems (like Dexcom G5 and G6) have FDA approval for decision-making without confirmatory blood glucose checks
  • CGM accuracy can be affected by different factors 1, 4:

    • Potential interfering substances vary between systems and include acetaminophen, ascorbic acid, and certain medications
    • Environmental factors like hypoxemia can affect accuracy of some systems
    • Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease may experience different accuracy levels with various CGM systems
  • Special considerations for specific patient populations 1:

    • In patients with end-stage kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis, certain glucose meters using glucose dehydrogenase pyrroloquinoline quinone methods can be affected by icodextrin-based solutions
    • CGM is currently not approved for use in pregnant patients, critically ill patients, and patients on dialysis 5

Practical Implications

  • The choice of CGM device should be based on individual circumstances, preferences, and needs 1

  • Users should be educated on potential interfering substances and other factors that may affect accuracy of their specific device 1

  • Skin reactions due to irritation or allergy should be assessed and addressed to aid in successful use of devices 1

  • People with diabetes should have uninterrupted access to their supplies to minimize gaps in continuous glucose monitoring 1

  • Real-time CGM should be used as close to daily as possible for maximal benefit, while intermittently scanned CGM devices should be scanned frequently (at minimum once every 8 hours) 1

In conclusion, healthcare providers should be aware of the significant differences between CGM systems when recommending them to patients, and should consider the specific features, accuracy, and limitations of each system based on individual patient needs 1.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Vitamin D Supplementation and CGM Results

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Review of an Innovation in Diabetes Management.

The American journal of the medical sciences, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.