Evaluation and Management of Lower GI Bleeding in Adults
The recommended evaluation of lower GI bleeding in adults should follow a systematic approach starting with risk stratification, followed by diagnostic colonoscopy, with consideration of radiographic studies for unstable patients or when endoscopy is not feasible. 1
Initial Assessment and Risk Stratification
- Patients presenting with lower GI bleeding should be stratified as unstable (shock index >1) or stable, with stable bleeds further categorized as major or minor using risk assessment tools like the Oakland score 1
- Initial assessment should include history of comorbidities and medications that promote bleeding, hemodynamic parameters, physical examination (including digital rectal examination), and laboratory markers 2
- The Oakland score can identify patients suitable for outpatient management (score ≤8) versus those requiring hospital admission (score >8) 1
- Patients can be categorized into four groups: minor bleeding that resolves with conservative therapy (75-90% of cases), chronic intermittent bleeding, severe life-threatening bleeding with periods of stability, or continual active bleeding 1
Resuscitation and Blood Transfusion
- Resuscitation should occur concurrently with the initial evaluation, including fluid resuscitation and blood transfusion if necessary for hemodynamic instability 1
- For hemodynamically stable patients with no history of cardiovascular disease, implement a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy (hemoglobin threshold ≤7 g/dL) 2
- For patients with acute or chronic cardiovascular disease, use a more liberal transfusion strategy (hemoglobin threshold ≤8 g/dL) with a post-transfusion target of ≥10 g/dL 2
- Coagulopathy (INR >1.5) or thrombocytopenia (<50,000/μL) should be corrected with fresh frozen plasma or platelets, respectively 1
Diagnostic Approach
Upper GI Endoscopy
- For patients with severe hematochezia and hypovolemia, an upper GI source should be considered, as it accounts for 10-15% of such cases 1
- Upper endoscopy should be performed early in patients with risk factors for peptic ulcer, portal hypertension, or angiodysplasia 1
- Nasogastric lavage before upper endoscopy is warranted if there is medium to low suspicion of an upper GI source 1
Colonoscopy
- Colonoscopy is the diagnostic procedure of choice for acute lower GI bleeding with a diagnostic accuracy of 72-86% 1
- Colonoscopy should be performed during the hospital stay for patients with major acute lower GI bleeding 2
- The diagnostic yield of colonoscopy is very high and should be recommended in the workup of patients presenting with bleeding per rectum 3
- Urgent colonoscopy after rapid bowel cleansing is feasible and useful in patients with severe hematochezia 1
Radiographic Studies
- For hemodynamically unstable patients with suspected ongoing bleeding, CT angiography should be performed before endoscopic or radiologic treatment to locate the bleeding site 2
- Plain abdominal radiography should be performed prior to colonoscopy if bowel perforation or obstruction is suspected 1
- Multidetector CT (MDCT) has an evolving role in localizing acute lower GI bleeding with an accuracy rate of 54-79% 1
Radionuclide Imaging
- Radionuclide imaging detects active bleeding at rates of 0.1-0.5 mL/min and is more sensitive than angiography but less specific than endoscopic or angiographic study 1
- [99Tcm] pertechnetate-labeled red blood cell scanning is preferred for evaluation of lower GI bleeding which may be episodic 1
- Early scans (<4 hours after baseline) may be helpful in localizing the bleeding site, while delayed scans are less efficient 1
- A positive red blood cell scan should be followed by urgent angiography within 1 hour 1
Management Algorithm
Initial Assessment and Resuscitation
For Hemodynamically Stable Patients:
For Hemodynamically Unstable Patients:
If Bleeding Source Not Identified:
Management of Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy
- Vitamin K antagonists should be withheld in patients with major lower GI bleeding, with coagulopathy corrected according to bleeding severity and thrombotic risk 2
- Direct oral anticoagulants should be temporarily withheld at presentation in patients with major lower GI bleeding 2
- Low-dose aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prevention should not be withheld; if stopped, it should be resumed preferably within 5 days 2
- For patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, aspirin should be continued while the P2Y12 receptor antagonist can be continued or temporarily interrupted based on bleeding severity and ischemic risk 2
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Failure to consider an upper GI source in patients with severe hematochezia can lead to delayed diagnosis and treatment 1
- Delayed colonoscopy may reduce diagnostic yield, particularly for identifying stigmata of recent hemorrhage 1
- Overreliance on radionuclide imaging without confirmatory tests (colonoscopy, angiography) before surgery can lead to incorrect localization 1
- Premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy in patients with high cardiovascular risk can increase morbidity and mortality 2