Best Imaging Modality for Diagnosing Tracheo-Oesophageal Fistula
Combined bronchoscopy and endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing tracheo-oesophageal fistula (TEF), providing direct visualization of the fistula with the highest diagnostic accuracy. 1
Primary Diagnostic Approaches
Endoscopic Evaluation
- Flexible bronchoscopy combined with simultaneous oesophageal endoscopy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing TEF, particularly recurrent TEF 1
- This combined approach allows direct visualization of the fistula site and has the highest diagnostic accuracy 1
- During bronchoscopy, positive pressure insufflation, dye or contrast injection, and gentle probing can assist with fistula identification 1
- The TEF Respiratory Complications Recommendations (TEF-RCR) specifically considers combined bronchoscopy and endoscopy to be the gold standard for diagnosis of recurrent TEF 1
Contrast Studies
- Upper gastrointestinal 'pull-back' study is particularly effective for diagnosing small TEFs 1
- This technique involves injecting contrast under pressure using catheters in the oesophagus, forcing contrast through small fistulae 1
- Traditional contrast (gastrografin/barium) esophagogram can miss up to 30% of small esophageal perforations 1
- A contrast swallow study may identify TEF but has lower sensitivity than the pull-back technique 2
CT Imaging
- CT esophagogram has high sensitivity (95%) and specificity (91%) for detecting upper digestive tract perforations 1
- Contrast-enhanced CT can show indirect signs of TEF such as paraesophageal collections, free air, and pleural effusions 1
- CT has largely replaced traditional contrast esophagogram in many centers due to its higher sensitivity and ability to provide additional information about surrounding structures 1
- Three-dimensional CT reconstruction and virtual bronchoscopy can be useful in pre-operative evaluation of TEF 3
Diagnostic Algorithm
Initial Assessment:
- For patients with suspected TEF, begin with a contrast-enhanced CT with CT esophagography if the patient is hemodynamically stable 1
- This provides information about the fistula and any associated conditions
Definitive Diagnosis:
For Difficult Cases:
Special Considerations
- In intubated or unstable patients, intraoperative endoscopy can be employed to rule out esophageal perforation 1
- For patients at high risk of aspiration, a pull-back tube esophagogram may be safer than a standard contrast swallow 2
- In cases of recurrent TEF following previous repair, a high index of suspicion should be maintained as there is often a delay in diagnosis 1
- For congenital H-type TEF without esophageal atresia, contrast swallow studies may be sufficient in most cases, with pull-back studies reserved for equivocal cases 2
Pitfalls and Caveats
- Nasogastric tube-administered contrast may miss esophageal perforation during contrast studies 1
- During endoscopy, excessive insufflation may promote mediastinal contamination by increasing the size of the perforation; low-flow insufflation and use of CO2 rather than air are recommended 1
- A negative initial imaging study does not exclude TEF if clinical suspicion is high; persistent respiratory symptoms warrant further investigation regardless of age and duration since initial repair 1
- The site of the original defect in the posterior tracheal wall is usually recognizable during bronchoscopy; however, smaller openings might be obscured by airway secretions 1