What is the diagnostic test for anti-phospholipid (Anti-PL) syndrome?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Testing for Antiphospholipid Syndrome

The diagnostic testing for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) requires concurrent testing for lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) IgG and IgM, and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgG and IgM, with positive results persisting for at least 12 weeks. 1

Primary Diagnostic Tests

Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) Testing

  • Must be measured in citrated plasma using a 3-step methodology: screening, mixing, and confirmation 1
  • Requires parallel testing with both activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) as first-choice clotting tests 1
  • Omitting either APTT or dRVVT increases risk of underdiagnosis in up to 55% of triple aPL-positive samples 1
  • Results should be reported as positive or negative with warnings about potential interferences 1

Solid Phase Assays

  • Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) IgG and IgM isotypes 1
  • Anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgG and IgM isotypes 1
  • Both should be measured in plasma or serum by solid phase assays (ELISA or non-ELISA systems) 1
  • Results should be reported with their level; positivity defined as values above the 99th percentile of normal controls 1

Interpretation Guidelines

  • Persistence requirement: Two consecutive positive tests at least 12 weeks apart are required to rule out transient positivity 1
  • Triple positivity (LA, aCL, and aβ2GPI) or double positivity (aCL and aβ2GPI with concordant isotype) significantly increases confidence in APS diagnosis 1
  • IgG isotype antibodies are considered clinically more relevant than IgM 1
  • Low positive results around the cutoff value should be interpreted with caution due to potential 10% imprecision of solid phase methods 1

Special Testing Considerations

Testing During Anticoagulant Therapy

  • LA testing during anticoagulation may be unreliable but sometimes necessary 1
  • For patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), pretest DOAC removal procedures can be used 1
  • For patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), Taipan snake venom time/ecarin time (TSVT/ET) can be used, though it doesn't have 100% sensitivity 1
  • Ideally, LA should be assessed 1-2 weeks after discontinuation of VKA (with or without bridging to LMWH) 1

Second-Line Tests

  • Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) are not recommended as first-line tests but can be useful when LA testing is unreliable or uncertain 1
  • Anti-domain I antibodies (aDI) can be used to confirm the specificity and pathogenicity of aβ2GPI 1
  • aPS has shown high specificity (87%) and may detect additional APS cases when other aPL tests are negative 2

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Inappropriate use of classification criteria may lead to misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis of APS 1
  • Classification criteria (designed for research) are stricter than diagnostic criteria (used in clinical practice) 1
  • Single positive IgM antibody is considered less clinically relevant than IgG 1
  • LA testing can be affected by anticoagulant therapy, acute phase proteins, and other interferences 1
  • Laboratory results must be interpreted in clinical context with knowledge of anticoagulation status 1
  • Close interaction between the laboratory and clinician is essential for proper interpretation 1

Risk Stratification

  • Triple aPL positivity carries the highest thrombotic risk 1
  • Persistent single-positive LA has lower thrombotic risk than triple aPL positivity 1
  • Medium/high titer antibodies (>99th percentile) are of utmost importance for diagnosis 1

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.