Antiphospholipid Syndrome Workup
Initial Laboratory Testing
Perform all three core antibody tests simultaneously on the same blood sample: lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) IgG/IgM, and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgG/IgM. 1 This comprehensive triple testing is mandatory because each test detects different antibody populations, and triple-positive patients carry the highest thrombotic risk. 1, 2
Core Laboratory Tests
Lupus Anticoagulant (LA):
- Use a standardized 3-step methodology: screening tests, mixing studies, and confirmatory tests 2, 3
- Perform both APTT-based and dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) assays in parallel, as omitting either test can miss up to 55% of triple-positive cases 3
- Report results as positive or negative (not quantitative) 2
- Critical caveat: LA testing is unreliable in patients on anticoagulation (warfarin, DOACs, heparin), so ideally obtain samples before starting anticoagulation or use specialized protocols 2, 4
Anticardiolipin Antibodies (aCL):
- Measure IgG and IgM isotypes by ELISA or validated automated solid-phase assays 1, 2
- Positivity threshold: values above the 99th percentile of normal controls 1, 2
- The 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria define moderate titer as ≥40 Units and high titer as ≥80 Units 1, 2
- Must be β2GPI-dependent to avoid false positives from infections or drugs 1
Anti-β2 Glycoprotein I Antibodies (aβ2GPI):
- Measure IgG and IgM isotypes by ELISA 1, 2
- Same positivity thresholds as aCL: >99th percentile, with moderate (≥40 Units) and high (≥80 Units) titer definitions 1, 2
- IgG isotype carries stronger clinical significance than IgM 5, 3
Confirmation Testing
Any positive test must be repeated after exactly 12 weeks (minimum) to confirm persistent positivity and rule out transient antibodies. 1, 2 This confirmation requirement applies only to positive results, not negative ones. 2 Single positive tests are insufficient for diagnosis regardless of titer level.
Risk Stratification Based on Antibody Profile
The antibody profile determines thrombotic risk and guides management intensity:
High-Risk Profile:
- Triple positivity (LA + aCL + aβ2GPI, especially with concordant IgG isotype) carries the highest risk 2, 5, 3
- Double positivity with concordant isotype (both aCL and aβ2GPI IgG or both IgM) 5, 3
- High titers (≥80 Units) of aCL or aβ2GPI 1, 2
Moderate-Risk Profile:
Low-Risk Profile:
When to Retest Negative Results
Do not routinely repeat negative tests unless specific interfering conditions were present during initial testing. 2 Retest negative results only if:
- Initial testing was performed during acute thrombosis (antibodies may be consumed at thrombotic site) 2
- Patient was on anticoagulation during LA testing (causes false negatives) 2
- Testing occurred during pregnancy (Factor VIII elevation can mask LA by shortening APTT) 2
- Strong clinical suspicion persists with recurrent thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity despite negative standard testing 2
Additional Considerations
Emerging Tests (Not Yet Standard):
- Anti-domain I β2GPI antibodies (aDI) confirm higher thrombotic risk in already positive patients but do not replace standard testing 2, 4
- Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies may be considered only in patients with strong clinical suspicion who are negative for all three standard tests 1, 2
- Thrombin generation assays remain investigational 1, 4
IgA Isotype Testing:
- IgA aCL and aβ2GPI remain controversial and are not included in current diagnostic criteria 1
- Consider testing only in highly selected cases with strong clinical suspicion and negative IgG/IgM results 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid:
- Never diagnose APS on a single positive test—confirmation at 12 weeks is mandatory 1, 2
- Isolated low-positive IgM results have limited clinical significance, especially in thrombotic APS 5
- Results near cutoff values (within 10% of threshold) should be repeated due to assay imprecision 2
- Always interpret results in clinical context with close laboratory-clinician collaboration 1, 2
- Classification criteria (2023 ACR/EULAR) are designed for research; clinical diagnosis should be broader to avoid underdiagnosis 1