What considerations are necessary when comparing SUV numbers from a PSMA (Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen) PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scan for prostate metastasis using Gallium-68 versus Fluorine-18?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Considerations When Comparing SUV Numbers from Gallium-68 and Fluorine-18 PSMA PET Scans

When comparing SUV numbers between Gallium-68 and Fluorine-18 PSMA PET scans for prostate metastasis detection, clinicians must recognize that F-18 DCFPyL PET/CT demonstrates higher sensitivity (88%) compared to Ga-68 HBED-CC PET/CT (66%) for PSA values ≥3.5 mg/L, which can significantly impact interpretation of results. 1

Tracer-Specific Differences

  • F-18 PSMA tracers generally show higher SUVmax values compared to Ga-68 PSMA tracers, with studies showing significantly higher mean SUVmax in concordant lesions (14.5 vs. 12.2, p=0.028) 2
  • Tumor-to-background ratios are significantly higher for F-18 DCFPyL compared to Ga-68 PSMA-HBED-CC when using kidney, spleen, or parotid as reference organs 2
  • Ga-68 PSMA demonstrates better contrast ratio between tumor and normal prostate tissue (median SUV%-CR: 3.3) compared to F-18 PSMA (median SUV%-CR: 1.8) 3

Technical Factors Affecting SUV Measurements

  • Reconstruction algorithms significantly impact SUV measurements, with Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) reconstructions showing different variability compared to standard OSEM reconstructions 4
  • SUV repeatability varies by lesion size, with smaller lesions exhibiting poorer repeatability on both standard and BPL reconstructions (p<0.0001) 4
  • SUV measurements have upper and lower limits of agreement of approximately +43% and -46% for standard reconstructions, indicating substantial variability even when using the same tracer 4

Clinical Factors Influencing SUV Interpretation

  • PSA levels significantly affect detection rates and SUV intensity for both tracers, with higher PSA associated with higher SUVmax values 5
  • Patients with PSA ≥10.0 ng/ml exhibit significantly higher PSMA uptake than those with PSA levels <10.0 ng/ml (median SUVmax: 17.6 versus 7.7; p<0.001) 5
  • Gleason score correlates with SUVmax values, with higher Gleason scores (>7) showing significantly higher tracer uptake (median SUVmax: 21.2) compared to lower Gleason scores (median SUVmax: 5.9-8.3 for GS 6-7) 5
  • Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) status affects detection rates, with ADT-positive patients showing higher detection rates (97.7% vs. 86.3%, p=0.038) 1

Practical Recommendations

  • When comparing sequential scans using different tracers, consider that a change in SUVmax of less than 50% may be within the normal variability of the measurement and not represent true disease progression or response 4
  • For small lesions (<1cm), expect greater variability in SUV measurements regardless of which tracer is used 4
  • Consider using tumor-to-background ratios rather than absolute SUVmax values when comparing scans with different tracers 2
  • When switching between tracers, recognize that F-18 PSMA may detect additional lesions not visualized on Ga-68 PSMA scans due to higher sensitivity 2

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Avoid direct numerical comparison of SUVmax values between different tracers without accounting for the systematic differences in biodistribution and uptake patterns 3, 2
  • Do not interpret changes in SUV measurements less than 50% as definitive evidence of disease progression or response when comparing different tracers 4
  • Be cautious when comparing lesion detection between tracers in patients with low PSA values (<3.5 ng/mL) where sensitivity differences are most pronounced 1
  • Remember that technical factors such as acquisition parameters, reconstruction algorithms, and time post-injection can significantly affect SUV measurements independent of tracer differences 4

Related Questions

Does Gallium-68 produce lower SUV numbers compared to other tracers?
Does Gallium-68 (Gallium-68 Positron Emission Tomography) produce lower Standardized Uptake Values (SUV) than Fluorine-18 (Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose) in detecting prostate cancer metastasis?
Does Gallium-68 (Ga-68) produce lower SUV (Standardized Uptake Value) numbers compared to other tracers in detecting prostate cancer metastasis?
What is the preferred reference organ for F-18 (Fluorine-18) PSMA (Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen) PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scans?
What is the preferred reference organ, spleen or parotid gland, for interpreting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) avid lesions in a Fluorine-18 (F-18) PSMA Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan?
How do you treat Amyloidosis, specifically light-chain (AL) amyloidosis?
Does a patient with active audible and visual hallucinations, responding to internal stimuli, meet criteria for involuntary admission despite driving themselves to the emergency room (ER) for medical screening and seeking help voluntarily?
What is the recommended antibiotic regimen for a peritoneal dialysis patient with peritonitis and an allergy to cephalosporins (antibiotics) in an outpatient setting?
What is the treatment for a patient with diffuse painless thyroid gland enlargement, normal Triiodothyronine (T3) and Thyroxine (T4) levels, elevated Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH) levels, and positive thyroid antibodies, suggestive of Hashimoto's thyroiditis?
What is the recommended treatment for knee pain without an apparent injury?
What is the treatment for a patient with diffuse painless thyroid gland enlargement, normal Triiodothyronine (T3) and Thyroxine (T4) levels, elevated Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH) levels, and positive thyroid antibodies, suggestive of Hashimoto's thyroiditis?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.