What is the preferred reference organ for F-18 (Fluorine-18) PSMA (Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen) PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scans?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Preferred Reference Organ for F-18 PSMA PET Scans

The parotid gland is the preferred reference organ for F-18 PSMA PET scan interpretation, based on its superior test-retest repeatability and established use in standardized reporting frameworks.

Primary Reference Organ: Parotid Gland

The parotid gland demonstrates the highest repeatability for F-18 PSMA tracers and serves as the standard reference in clinical practice. 1, 2

  • For F-18 DCFPyL (a widely used F-18 PSMA tracer), the parotid gland shows excellent test-retest repeatability with a within-subject coefficient of variation (wCOV) of only 9.0-14.3% for SUVmean measurements 1

  • The whole parotid gland (using a 40% SUV threshold ROI) demonstrates minimal inter-reader variability with bias±limits of agreement of -0.05±0.31 for PET/CT and 0.08±0.24 for PET/MR 2

  • Standardized frameworks for PSMA scan interpretation (PROMISE criteria) specifically rely on parotid gland uptake as the reference standard 1

Practical Implementation

Use the entire parotid gland rather than small 1-cm regions of interest for optimal reproducibility. 1, 2

  • Whole parotid gland measurements show superior repeatability compared to smaller 1-cm spherical ROIs within the gland 1, 2

  • Small ROIs in the parotid demonstrate greater inter-reader variability (wCOV 12.4% for submandibular, 23.9% for lacrimal glands) 1

  • The parotid gland provides higher tumor-to-background ratios compared to other reference organs when evaluating F-18 PSMA lesions 3

Alternative Reference Organs

The liver serves as an acceptable alternative reference organ, particularly for quantitative assessments. 1, 2

  • Liver SUVmean demonstrates high repeatability (wCOV 9.0-14.3%) comparable to the parotid gland 1

  • Right hepatic lobe measurements show minimal inter-reader variability (bias±LOA of -0.55±0.82 for PET/CT) 2

  • However, tumor-to-liver ratios may not show significant differences compared to tumor-to-parotid ratios for F-18 PSMA tracers 3

Blood pool (mediastinum) can be used but shows slightly lower repeatability. 1, 2

  • Blood pool SUVmean has acceptable repeatability with minimal inter-reader variability (bias±LOA -0.13±0.42) 2

  • Tumor-to-mediastinum ratios do not show significant advantages over parotid-based ratios for F-18 PSMA imaging 3

Clinical Significance

The parotid gland reference is particularly important for predicting response to PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy. 4

  • The PSMA PET tumor-to-salivary gland (PSG) score using parotid uptake as reference predicts treatment response and overall survival after Lu-177 PSMA therapy 4

  • Patients with high PSG scores (tumor uptake > 1.5 times parotid uptake) show significantly better PSA response rates (69.6% vs 38.7% vs 16.7% for high vs intermediate vs low groups, P<0.001) 4

  • Visual assessment of tumor uptake relative to parotid glands demonstrates substantial inter-reader reproducibility (Fleiss weighted κ = 0.68) 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Avoid using small ROIs or submandibular/lacrimal glands as primary references due to higher variability. 1, 2

  • Submandibular and lacrimal glands show significantly higher inter-reader and test-retest variability compared to parotid glands 1

  • SUVmax measurements in reference organs generally show lower repeatability than SUVmean measurements (wCOV range 14.1-45.2% for large organs) 1

Be aware that inter-subject variability is inherently higher for parotid glands compared to liver or blood pool, but this does not affect its utility as a reference standard. 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.