What is the treatment for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV)

Canalith repositioning procedures (CRPs) should be the first-line treatment for BPPV, with the specific maneuver determined by which semicircular canal is affected. 1

First-Line Treatments Based on Canal Involvement

Posterior Canal BPPV (Most Common)

  • The Epley maneuver (canalith repositioning procedure) is the primary treatment with success rates of approximately 80% after 1-3 treatments 2, 1
  • The procedure involves a series of head position changes:
    1. Patient seated with head turned 45° toward affected ear
    2. Rapidly laid back to supine head-hanging 20° position for 20-30 seconds
    3. Head turned 90° toward unaffected side for 20 seconds
    4. Head turned further 90° (patient moves to lateral position) for 20-30 seconds
    5. Patient returns to upright sitting position 2
  • The Semont maneuver (liberatory maneuver) is an effective alternative with comparable efficacy 1, 3

Horizontal (Lateral) Canal BPPV

  • The Barbecue Roll maneuver (Lempert maneuver) is the first-line treatment, involving rolling the patient 360° in sequential steps 2, 1
  • The Gufoni maneuver is an easier alternative that only requires identifying the side with weaker nystagmus 3, 4

Treatment Efficacy and Expectations

  • Patients treated with CRP have 6.5 times greater chance of symptom improvement compared to observation alone (OR 6.52; 95% CI 4.17-10.20) 1
  • A single CRP is more than 10 times more effective than a week of Brandt-Daroff exercises (OR 12.38; 95% CI 4.32-35.47) 1
  • Success rates of 85% can be achieved with a single treatment session 5
  • Patients may experience mild residual symptoms for a few days to weeks after successful treatment 1

Post-Treatment Recommendations

  • Postprocedural restrictions are NOT recommended after CRP for posterior canal BPPV 2, 1
  • Previous restrictions such as sleeping with head elevated or avoiding certain positions have not been shown to improve outcomes 2

Alternative and Adjunctive Treatments

Vestibular Rehabilitation

  • May be offered as initial treatment or in conjunction with CRPs 2
  • Includes habituation exercises, adaptation exercises for gaze stabilization, and balance training 2
  • Particularly useful for patients with persistent symptoms or recurrent BPPV 2

Self-Administered Treatments

  • Self-administered CRP can be taught to motivated patients with 64% improvement rates compared to 23% for self-administered Brandt-Daroff exercises 2, 1
  • Home-based exercises may improve long-term outcomes and decrease recurrence rates 2

Medication Use

  • Vestibular suppressant medications (antihistamines, benzodiazepines) should NOT be routinely used for treating BPPV 1
  • Medications may cause significant adverse effects including drowsiness, cognitive deficits, increased fall risk (especially in elderly), and can interfere with central compensation 1
  • Meclizine may be considered only for short-term management of severe autonomic symptoms (nausea, vomiting) but does not treat the underlying condition 1, 6

Special Considerations

Treatment Failures

  • If symptoms persist after initial treatment:
    • Reevaluate for persistent BPPV that may respond to additional repositioning maneuvers 1
    • Consider involvement of other semicircular canals 1
    • Assess for coexisting vestibular conditions 1
    • Repeat CRPs can achieve success rates of 90-98% for persistent BPPV 1
  • For persistent cases not responding to standard CRP, adding mastoid vibration may improve outcomes 7
  • Multiple CRPs in the same session may improve efficacy, with evidence suggesting an additional CRP after a negative Dix-Hallpike retest may reduce recurrence 8

Risk Factors for Recurrence

  • Higher recurrence rates are observed in:
    • Elderly patients 5
    • Patients with history of head trauma 5
    • Patients with history of vestibular neuropathy 5
  • These patients may require additional education and follow-up to minimize potential morbidity from falls 5

Contraindications and Precautions

  • Patients with physical limitations may not be candidates for standard maneuvers, including those with:
    • Cervical stenosis, severe rheumatoid arthritis, cervical radiculopathies
    • Morbid obesity, ankylosing spondylitis, low back dysfunction
    • Retinal detachment, spinal cord injuries 2
  • These patients may need specialized examination tables or modified approaches 2, 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.