What are the diagnostic criteria for rheumatic fever?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Criteria for Rheumatic Fever

The diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever requires evidence of preceding Group A Streptococcal infection plus either two major criteria, or one major and two minor criteria according to the Jones Criteria, which remain the accepted standard for diagnosis. 1, 2

Major Criteria

  • Carditis - Clinical and/or subclinical (detected by echocardiography) 1, 2

    • Echocardiographic criteria for mitral regurgitation: jet in 2 planes, >1 cm, holosystolic, velocity >2.5 m/s 2
    • Echocardiographic criteria for aortic regurgitation: jet in 2 planes, holodiastolic, velocity >2.5 m/s 2
  • Arthritis 1, 2

    • Low-risk populations: Polyarthritis only
    • Moderate/high-risk populations: Monoarthritis or polyarthritis
    • Moderate/high-risk populations: Polyarthralgia (after excluding other causes)
  • Sydenham's Chorea - Involuntary, purposeless movements 1, 3

  • Erythema Marginatum - Characteristic evanescent rash with clear centers and rounded edges 1, 2

  • Subcutaneous Nodules - Firm, painless nodules over bony prominences 1, 2

Minor Criteria

  • Fever 1, 2

    • Low-risk populations: ≥38.5°C
    • Moderate/high-risk populations: ≥38°C
  • Arthralgia 1, 2

    • Low-risk populations: Polyarthralgia
    • Moderate/high-risk populations: Monoarthralgia (when not counted as major criterion)
  • Elevated Acute Phase Reactants 1, 2

    • Low-risk populations: ESR ≥60 mm/hr and/or CRP ≥3.0 mg/dL
    • Moderate/high-risk populations: ESR ≥30 mm/hr and/or CRP ≥3.0 mg/dL
  • Prolonged PR interval on ECG (after accounting for age variability, unless carditis is a major criterion) 1, 2

Evidence of Preceding Group A Streptococcal Infection

One of the following must be present 1, 3:

  • Positive throat culture for Group A Streptococcus
  • Positive rapid Group A Streptococcal antigen test
  • Elevated or rising streptococcal antibody titers (anti-streptolysin O, anti-DNase B)

Special Considerations

  • Recurrent Rheumatic Fever - In patients with previous rheumatic fever or established rheumatic heart disease, the diagnosis requires: 2 major criteria, or 1 major and 2 minor criteria, or 3 minor criteria 1, 2

  • Population-Based Risk Stratification - Different diagnostic thresholds exist for low-risk versus moderate/high-risk populations 1, 4

    • Low-risk: ARF incidence ≤2 per 100,000 school-aged children or rheumatic heart disease prevalence ≤1 per 1,000 population
    • Moderate/high-risk: Higher prevalence regions
  • Role of Echocardiography - Echocardiography is now recommended for all patients with suspected ARF 1, 4

    • Subclinical carditis detected by echocardiography is considered a major criterion in all populations 1, 2
    • Helps differentiate pathological from physiological valve regurgitation 1, 5
  • Diagnostic Challenges 2, 6

    • Differentiate from post-streptococcal reactive arthritis (PSRA)
    • Exclude other diseases when using monoarthritis or polyarthralgia as criteria
    • Distinguish from Lyme disease, serum sickness, and drug reactions
  • "Possible" Rheumatic Fever - In cases of diagnostic uncertainty with high clinical suspicion, consider prophylactic antibiotics for 12 months followed by reevaluation 2, 6

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Overdiagnosis in low-risk populations where other conditions may mimic ARF 7, 3
  • Underdiagnosis in high-risk populations due to strict adherence to criteria 5, 6
  • Failure to document preceding streptococcal infection 1, 3
  • Misinterpreting physiological valve regurgitation as pathological on echocardiography 1, 2
  • Relying solely on echocardiographic findings without clinical correlation 1, 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.