MRI vs CT for Migraine Headaches
Neither MRI nor CT is routinely recommended for patients with migraine headaches who have a normal neurological examination, as both modalities have low diagnostic yield in this population. 1
Neuroimaging Recommendations for Migraine
- Neuroimaging (either MRI or CT) is not usually warranted in patients with migraine who have normal findings on neurological examination (Grade B recommendation) 1
- The prevalence of significant intracranial abnormalities in migraine patients with normal neurological examinations is approximately 0.2%, making routine imaging unnecessary 1
- Brain MRI obtained at the specific request of migraine patients with normal neurological examination results has a yield equivalent to that of the general asymptomatic population 2
When Neuroimaging Should Be Considered
- Neuroimaging should be considered in patients with headache and an unexplained abnormal finding on neurological examination (Grade B recommendation) 1
- A lower threshold for imaging may be appropriate in patients with:
MRI vs CT Comparison
- Based on limited data, MRI may be more sensitive than CT in identifying clinically insignificant abnormalities, but may be no more sensitive than CT in identifying clinically significant pathology 1
- There is insufficient evidence to make definitive recommendations regarding the comparative sensitivity of MRI and CT (Grade C recommendation) 1
- The greater resolution of MRI appears to be of little clinical importance in the evaluation of non-acute headache 1
Special Considerations
- In emergency settings with suspected subarachnoid hemorrhage, CT without contrast is preferred due to its superior ability to detect acute blood products 1
- For suspected brain tumors in emergency settings, CT without IV contrast can be performed initially, but contrast-enhanced studies may be needed if MRI is not possible 1
- CT is sometimes preferred in acute settings due to its speed and availability, particularly when evaluating for acute conditions 1, 3
Principles for Diagnostic Imaging Decision-Making
The U.S. Headache Consortium advocates three consensus-based principles for diagnostic imaging:
- Testing should be avoided if it will not lead to a change in management 1
- Testing is not recommended if the patient is not significantly more likely than the general population to have a significant abnormality 1
- Testing that is not normally recommended may make sense in individual cases, such as in patients who are excessively worried about serious problems causing their headaches 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Ordering neuroimaging for reassurance alone may not reduce patient anxiety according to limited evidence 4
- Incidental findings are common (up to 38.5% in some studies) and may lead to unnecessary additional testing and patient anxiety 5
- "Sinus headache" is a common misdiagnosis among migraine sufferers, and neuroimaging is not indicated for this presumptive diagnosis 1
- Overreliance on neuroimaging may delay appropriate migraine-specific treatment and management 2