Guidelines for Managing Traumatic Brain Injury in the ICU
The management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the ICU requires a stepwise approach with interventions escalated based on patient response, with ICP monitoring strongly indicated in severe TBI patients with abnormal CT findings as more than 50% will develop intracranial hypertension. 1
Initial Assessment and Monitoring
- Severe TBI is defined as Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤8, moderate TBI as GCS 9-13, and mild TBI as GCS 14-15 1
- ICP monitoring is strongly indicated in severe TBI patients with abnormal CT findings, as the incidence of high ICP varies between 17-88% in these patients 2, 1
- ICP monitoring should not be performed if the initial CT scan is normal with no evidence of clinical severity or transcranial Doppler abnormalities 2
- Consider ICP monitoring after evacuation of post-traumatic intracranial hematoma if any of these criteria are present: preoperative GCS motor response ≤5, preoperative anisocoria/mydriasis, hemodynamic instability, severity signs on imaging, intraoperative cerebral edema, or postoperative new lesions 2
First-Tier Interventions
- Maintain cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) between 60-70 mmHg in adults without multi-modal monitoring 2, 1
- Position the head of bed at 20-30° to assist venous drainage and minimize edema 3
- Provide sedation and analgesia following protocols similar to non-brain injured patients, with modifications for ICP control 3
- Maintain PaCO₂ between 35-40 mmHg during routine management 1, 3
- Avoid hypotension as decreased CPP below 60 mmHg can worsen brain edema and secondary injury 1, 3
Second-Tier Interventions for Refractory Intracranial Hypertension
- Use osmotherapy with hypertonic saline or mannitol for refractory intracranial hypertension 1
- Consider temporary hyperventilation (PaCO₂ 30-35 mmHg) for acute ICP crises or signs of herniation 3
- Avoid hypo-osmolar fluids that may worsen cerebral edema 1, 3
Third-Tier Interventions
- Consider decompressive craniectomy to control intracranial pressure in the early phase of TBI with refractory intracranial hypertension after multidisciplinary discussion 2
- Be aware that decompressive craniectomy may reduce mortality (26.9% vs 48.9% in medical management) but potentially at the expense of increased severe disability 2, 3
- The RESCUE-ICP study showed that while mortality was reduced with decompressive craniectomy compared to barbiturate coma (26.9% vs 48.9%), favorable outcome at 6 months was not significantly different (27.4% vs 26.6%) 2
- Bifrontal craniectomy was associated with worse outcomes in the DECRA study and should be used cautiously 3
Critical Parameters to Maintain
- Oxygenation: Maintain PaO₂ between 60-100 mmHg 1, 3
- Ventilation: Maintain PaCO₂ between 35-40 mmHg (except during temporary hyperventilation for herniation) 1, 3
- Coagulation: Maintain platelet count >50,000/mm³ for life-threatening hemorrhage and higher for neurosurgical interventions 3
- Hemostasis: Keep PT/aPTT <1.5 times normal control during interventions 3
Management of TBI with Polytrauma
- For patients with both TBI and extracranial injuries causing bleeding, there is a challenging balance between addressing life-threatening hemorrhage and preventing secondary brain injury 1
- Avoid "permissive hypotension" strategies in TBI patients as arterial hypotension exacerbates cerebral secondary damage 1
- For patients requiring both neurosurgical intervention and treatment for life-threatening hemorrhage elsewhere, establish protocols for simultaneous multisystem surgery 3
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Daily interruption of sedation may be harmful in TBI patients with signs of high ICP 3
- Avoid hypotension, as decreased cerebral perfusion pressure below 60 mmHg can worsen brain edema and secondary injury 1, 3
- Corticosteroids have not shown benefit in TBI and are not recommended for ICP control 3
- Avoid hypo-osmolar fluids that may worsen cerebral edema 1, 3
- An ICP of 20-40 mmHg is associated with a 3.95 times higher risk of mortality and poor neurological outcome; above 40 mmHg, mortality risk increases 6.9-fold 2, 1