What is the recommended treatment for M1 (Middle Cerebral Artery) occlusion thrombectomy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Mechanical Thrombectomy for M1 Occlusion

Mechanical thrombectomy with a stent retriever is strongly recommended as first-line treatment for patients with M1 (middle cerebral artery) occlusion who meet eligibility criteria, with treatment initiated within 6 hours of symptom onset. 1

Primary Eligibility Criteria

  • Patients should receive mechanical thrombectomy with a stent retriever if they meet all of the following criteria:
    • Prestroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 1 1, 2
    • Causative occlusion of the internal carotid artery or MCA segment 1 (M1) 1, 2
    • Age ≥18 years 1, 2
    • NIHSS score of ≥6 1, 2
    • ASPECTS of ≥6 1, 2
    • Treatment can be initiated (groin puncture) within 6 hours of symptom onset 1, 2

Treatment Protocol

  • Do not delay mechanical thrombectomy to observe for clinical response after IV alteplase administration (Class III: Harm recommendation) 1
  • The technical goal of thrombectomy should be to achieve reperfusion with a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) grade 2b/3 3, 2
  • Stent retrievers are the preferred devices for mechanical thrombectomy 1, 2
  • Time to treatment is critical - each 1-hour delay to reperfusion is associated with:
    • Less favorable degree of disability (common odds ratio 0.84) 1
    • Reduced functional independence (odds ratio 0.81) 1

Extended Time Window Considerations

  • For patients within 6-16 hours of last known normal, mechanical thrombectomy is recommended if they meet DAWN or DEFUSE 3 eligibility criteria 2
  • For patients within 16-24 hours of last known normal, mechanical thrombectomy is reasonable if they meet DAWN eligibility criteria 2
  • Advanced imaging (CTP or DW-MRI with or without MRI perfusion) is required for patient selection in the extended time window 2

Special Considerations

  • Pretreatment with IV alteplase is not required for mechanical thrombectomy eligibility, as demonstrated by the HERMES collaboration analysis (cOR 2.43; 95% CI 1.30-4.55) 1
  • Mechanical thrombectomy shows benefit across age groups, including patients ≥80 years old (cOR 3.68; 95% CI 1.95-6.92) 1
  • For patients ≥90 years of age, the benefit is less clear due to limited trial data, and comorbidities should be carefully considered 1

M2 Occlusions

  • Mechanical thrombectomy may be reasonable for carefully selected patients with M2 occlusions within 6 hours of symptom onset (Class IIb recommendation) 1, 3
  • The HERMES meta-analysis showed a positive treatment effect for M2 occlusions, though the adjusted common odds ratio was not statistically significant (1.28; 95% CI: 0.51-3.21) 3
  • Reperfusion in patients with M2 occlusions has been associated with excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1; OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.0-4.7) 3

Implementation Requirements

  • Treatment requires an experienced stroke center with immediate access to cerebral angiography and qualified interventionalists 2
  • Patients should be transported rapidly to the closest available certified primary stroke center or comprehensive stroke center 2
  • An integrated, multidisciplinary approach including stroke physicians, interventional cardiologists, neurologists, radiologists, and anesthesiologists is essential for optimal treatment decisions 1

Clinical Outcomes

  • Early thrombectomy can provide excellent outcomes, with case reports demonstrating complete recovery with no infarct when treatment is initiated rapidly 4
  • Stent-based thrombectomy has shown high rates of successful recanalization (90-100%) and good functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) in 77% of patients at 90 days 5

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Observing for clinical response after IV alteplase before pursuing mechanical thrombectomy should be avoided as it delays treatment and worsens outcomes 1
  • IV thrombolysis should not be withheld in eligible patients, even if mechanical thrombectomy is being considered 3, 2
  • Strict adherence to DAWN or DEFUSE-3 eligibility criteria is necessary for patient selection in the extended time window 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Criteria for Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Proximal M2 Occlusions

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.