Difference Between Total Hysterectomy and Extrafascial Hysterectomy
A total hysterectomy and an extrafascial (simple) hysterectomy are the same procedure, both referring to the complete removal of the uterus and cervix while preserving the surrounding tissue planes. 1
Defining Characteristics
- Total/extrafascial hysterectomy involves removal of the uterine corpus and cervix without removing parametrial tissue, preserving the fascial planes surrounding the uterus 1
- The procedure removes the uterus with the outer wall while preserving the surrounding fascia and ligaments 2
- This is in contrast to radical hysterectomy, which removes additional parametrial tissue and a portion of the upper vagina 1
Surgical Technique
- In total/extrafascial hysterectomy, the surgeon cuts parametrial tissue along the circumference of the cervix in three sequential steps:
- Clamping and cutting the uterine artery and upper part of cardinal ligament
- Clamping and cutting the sacrouterine ligament and posterior half of cardinal ligament
- Clamping and cutting the vesicouterine ligament and anterior half of cardinal ligament 2
- This technique moves the ureter progressively further from the surgical field with each transection, reducing risk of ureteral injury 2
Clinical Indications
- Total/extrafascial hysterectomy is indicated for:
Comparison to Other Hysterectomy Types
- Modified radical hysterectomy (Piver type II) removes more parametrial tissue than total/extrafascial hysterectomy and is typically used for stage II cervical cancers with macroscopic cervical lesions 1
- Radical hysterectomy (Piver type III or IV) removes even more parametrial tissue and is used for more advanced cervical cancer 1
- Supracervical hysterectomy preserves the cervix, unlike total/extrafascial hysterectomy which removes both uterus and cervix 1
Surgical Approaches
- Total/extrafascial hysterectomy can be performed via:
- The American College of Radiology recommends that when hysterectomy is indicated, the least invasive route should be chosen, with vaginal being preferred when technically feasible 3
Benefits and Considerations
- Vaginal approach offers shorter operating times, faster recovery, and better quality of life compared to abdominal approaches 3
- Robotic-assisted approach may be beneficial for patients with obesity or complex pathology 4
- Total/extrafascial hysterectomy has lower complication rates compared to more radical procedures 1
- For early cervical cancer, extrafascial hysterectomy is sufficient for stage IA1 without LVSI, while more radical approaches are needed for more advanced disease 1
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Potential complications include ureteral injury, intestinal damage, and bladder injury 2
- Following the correct tissue plane is crucial to avoid these complications 2
- For patients with endometrial cancer, the extent of surgery should be guided by disease staging and risk factors 5
- Uterine preservation options should be discussed before proceeding with any hysterectomy, especially for younger patients 3