Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score in Ankylosing Spondylitis
The BASDAI score is a critical validated tool for assessing disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis, providing a comprehensive patient-reported measurement of key symptoms that guides treatment decisions and monitoring of therapeutic response. 1
Components and Calculation of BASDAI
The BASDAI consists of six questions that assess five major domains of ankylosing spondylitis:
- Question 1: Overall level of fatigue/tiredness 1
- Question 2: Overall level of neck, back, or hip pain 1
- Question 3: Overall level of pain/swelling in joints other than neck, back, or hips 1
- Question 4: Overall level of discomfort from areas tender to touch or pressure 1
- Question 5: Overall level of morning stiffness 1
- Question 6: Duration of morning stiffness from time of waking 1
Each question is scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe). The final BASDAI score is calculated by averaging the scores of questions 1-4, adding the average of questions 5 and 6, and dividing by 5 2.
Clinical Significance and Treatment Decisions
- Disease activity assessment: BASDAI score ≥4 traditionally indicates active disease requiring more aggressive treatment 1, 3
- Treatment initiation: BASDAI is used as a criterion for initiating biologic therapy, with scores ≥4 often used as a threshold for considering TNF inhibitors or other biologics 1, 4, 5
- Treatment response monitoring: Regular assessment of BASDAI allows clinicians to evaluate treatment efficacy over time 1
- Clinical trials endpoint: BASDAI response (typically defined as improvement of ≥50% or ≥2 absolute points) is commonly used as an outcome measure in clinical trials 4, 5
Relationship to Other Disease Assessment Tools
ASDAS (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score): A newer composite measure that incorporates both patient-reported outcomes and objective inflammatory markers (CRP or ESR) 1, 6
ASAS response criteria: BASDAI components are incorporated into ASAS 20/40 response criteria and ASAS partial remission definitions 1
Correlation with Objective Measures
- MRI findings: BASDAI shows significant correlation with active sacroiliitis on MRI, supporting its validity as a measure of disease activity 8
- Inflammatory markers: While BASDAI is subjective, its correlation with elevated ESR/CRP in many patients supports its utility in disease assessment 1, 6
Limitations and Considerations
- Subjective nature: As a fully patient-reported measure, BASDAI may be influenced by non-inflammatory factors such as fibromyalgia, depression, or mechanical pain 1
- Reproducibility: Test-retest reliability studies show limits of agreement of ±1.8 points, indicating some variability in repeated measurements 9
- Lack of objective measures: Unlike ASDAS, BASDAI does not incorporate laboratory markers of inflammation 6
- Treatment effects: Biologic therapies may disproportionately affect inflammatory markers while symptom improvement lags, potentially creating discrepancies between BASDAI and actual disease activity 7
Clinical Application
- Frequency of assessment: BASDAI should be performed regularly in routine clinical practice, with frequency dependent on disease activity level 1
- Comprehensive evaluation: While BASDAI is central to disease assessment, other factors such as axial inflammation on MRI, radiographic progression, and extra-articular manifestations should also be considered 1
- Treatment targets: Current guidelines recommend targeting low disease activity or remission, with BASDAI used as one component of this assessment 1
Practical Implementation
- Administration: BASDAI is quick and simple for patients to complete (approximately 1 minute) 2
- Format: Can be administered using paper forms, electronic systems, or verbal questioning 2, 9
- Documentation: Regular documentation of BASDAI scores in medical records allows tracking of disease activity over time 1
The BASDAI remains a cornerstone of ankylosing spondylitis assessment, providing valuable information about disease activity from the patient perspective that guides clinical decision-making and treatment optimization 1.