What are the effects of sphenoid vein harvesting on the leg's venous system?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Effects of Saphenous Vein Harvesting on the Leg's Venous System

Saphenous vein harvesting typically results in minimal long-term venous morbidity in the leg despite causing venous outflow obstruction, as the body develops collateral venous channels to compensate for the removed vein. 1

Immediate and Short-Term Effects

  • Venous outflow obstruction is present in approximately 93% of harvest limbs compared to 36% of non-harvest limbs, indicating significant initial changes to venous hemodynamics 1

  • Some patients experience leg swelling in the immediate post-operative period, though this is typically temporary and resolves as collateral circulation develops 2

  • Wound complications can occur in approximately 4.1% of cases, with major complications requiring surgical intervention in about 0.65% of patients 3

  • Risk factors for major leg wound complications include female gender, peripheral vascular disease, and postoperative intraaortic balloon pump use 3

Long-Term Venous Adaptations

  • Large, direct collateral veins (4-6mm in diameter) develop between the popliteal vein stump and profunda femoris vein in about 34% of harvest limbs 1

  • The remaining 66% of patients develop smaller, less direct collateral channels to the profunda femoris vein to compensate for the removed saphenous vein 1

  • Ambulatory venous pressure (AVP) with exercise is significantly increased in harvest limbs (60 ± 4.7 mm Hg) compared to non-harvest limbs (47.8 ± 5.2 mm Hg) 1

  • Venous refill time in harvest limbs (15.1 ± 1.1 seconds) is shortened compared to non-harvest limbs (22.3 ± 2.1 seconds) 1

Clinical Manifestations

  • Less than one-third of patients develop mild edema without skin changes (CEAP class C3) in the long term 1

  • Major chronic venous changes (CEAP classes C4-C6) and venous claudication are rare following saphenous vein harvest 1

  • Mild venous reflux may develop in approximately 11% of harvest limbs, which is associated with a higher likelihood of edema 1

  • The presence or absence of an intact greater saphenous vein in the other leg does not significantly affect clinical outcomes 1

Factors Affecting Venous Function

  • The development of collateral venous channels is the primary mechanism that preserves venous function after saphenous vein harvest 1

  • Low incidence of significant reflux helps maintain adequate venous return despite the loss of the saphenous vein 1

  • Venous function tests typically show stabilization or improvement over time, suggesting adaptive mechanisms develop to compensate for the harvested vein 1

  • Duplex ultrasonography is the recommended first-line imaging method to assess the venous system before and after saphenous vein harvesting 4

Modern Approaches to Minimize Complications

  • Endoscopic vein harvesting significantly reduces leg wound infections (0.5%) compared to open harvesting techniques (2.7%) 5

  • Proper preoperative assessment of the venous system using duplex ultrasound can help identify patients at higher risk for complications 4

  • When saphenous vein harvesting is necessary, the autologous saphenous vein remains the conduit of choice for bypass procedures due to superior patency rates 4

  • Careful selection of harvest sites and proper surgical technique can minimize complications in patients with risk factors for poor wound healing 3

References

Research

Venous function and delayed leg swelling following saphenectomy in coronary artery bypass grafting.

The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official publication of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery = Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai zasshi, 1999

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.