Biceps Tenodesis: Surgical Procedure for Biceps Tendon Pathology
Biceps tenodesis is a surgical procedure that addresses pathologies of the long head of the biceps tendon by detaching it from its original insertion and reattaching it to a new location, typically to address pain caused by inflammation or instability of the tendon. 1
Definition and Purpose
- Biceps tenodesis involves detaching the long head of the biceps tendon from its original attachment and reattaching it to a different location, usually to the humerus or soft tissue 1, 2
- The procedure is performed to treat various biceps tendon pathologies including biceps tendinitis, SLAP tears, rotator interval pulley lesions, and failed SLAP repairs 3
- It aims to eliminate pain while maintaining the length-tension relationship of the biceps muscle to preserve function 2
Types of Biceps Tenodesis Techniques
Based on Location:
Suprapectoral tenodesis: Performed at or above the pectoralis major tendon 2
- Potential disadvantage: The biceps may be fixed proximally to zones of degeneration and inflammation, potentially causing residual pain 2
Subpectoral tenodesis: Performed below the pectoralis major tendon 2, 4
Based on Technique:
- Loop 'N' Tack biceps tenodesis: Shows high shoulder function scores and low pain scores one year postoperatively 1
- Arthroscopic proximal subpectoral tenodesis: Can be performed fully arthroscopically with all-suture anchor and soft-tissue tenodesis to the pectoralis major tendon 2
- Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis (OBT): Commonly performed with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation 4
Clinical Outcomes
- Both Loop 'N' Tack and subpectoral biceps tenodesis techniques show significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes 1
- Patients typically report high shoulder function scores and low pain scores one year postoperatively 1
- The procedure has a minimal risk of complications when measured one year postoperatively 1
Potential Complications
- Overall complication rate for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis is approximately 2.0% 4
- Possible complications include:
Diagnostic Approach for Biceps Tendon Pathology
- MRI is the most accurate imaging modality for diagnosing biceps tendon tears, with an accuracy of 86.4% compared to ultrasound (45.5%) 6
- Plain radiographs should be the first imaging study to rule out associated fractures or bony abnormalities 6, 7
- The FABS (flexion-abduction-supination) view is recommended for optimal visualization of the biceps tendon on MRI 6, 7
Clinical Considerations
- The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is unable to recommend for or against biceps tenotomy or tenodesis when performing shoulder arthroplasty in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis due to insufficient evidence 8
- Surgical practice regarding biceps tendon management during arthroplasty is largely based on anecdotal experience rather than evidence 8
- Revision biceps tenodesis may be necessary in cases of symptomatic failure, particularly in young active patients 3
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Failing to distinguish between partial and complete tears, which requires accurate imaging (preferably MRI) 6, 7
- Relying solely on ultrasound for diagnosis, which has limitations in accuracy compared to MRI 6, 7
- Inadequate fixation can lead to failure and Popeye deformity, requiring revision surgery 3