Neuroblastoma Chemotherapy Regimens
The preferred chemotherapy regimens for high-risk neuroblastoma are the 5-cycle ANBL12P1 or ANBL1531 induction protocols, which include combinations of topotecan, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, etoposide, and doxorubicin, followed by consolidation with tandem transplantation using high-dose chemotherapy. 1
Induction Therapy for High-Risk Neuroblastoma
Induction therapy aims to reduce disease burden before subsequent treatment phases through:
- Multiagent cytoreductive chemotherapy combined with surgical resection of primary tumor and locoregional disease 1
- Collection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells during induction to support later consolidation therapy 1
Preferred Induction Regimens:
ANBL12P1 or ANBL1531 (5-cycle regimens) - These are the NCCN-preferred protocols with:
ANBL0532 (6-cycle regimen) - An acceptable alternative regimen 1
- Similar components but with longer duration
- Demonstrated 39.1% partial response or better after first 2 cycles with topotecan and cyclophosphamide 1
Evolution of Induction Regimens:
The development of these protocols has been driven by:
- Need to reduce exposure to nephrotoxic and cardiotoxic agents while maintaining efficacy 1
- Evidence that 5-cycle induction achieves comparable response rates to longer 7-cycle regimens 1
- Approximately 9% of patients progress despite intensive regimens 1
Surgical Considerations During Induction:
- Upfront resection is rarely feasible due to aggressive nature of tumors 1
- Surgical resection typically performed after several cycles of cytoreductive chemotherapy 1
- Goal is gross total resection (>90% resection) rather than negative margins 1
- Subtotal resection is recommended when vital structures would be threatened 1
Consolidation Therapy
For patients who respond adequately to induction therapy:
Tandem transplantation with two consecutive rounds of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue is recommended (Category 1) 1
- First transplant: Thiotepa/cyclophosphamide
- Second transplant: Reduced-dose carboplatin/etoposide/melphalan (CEM)
- This approach showed significantly improved 3-year EFS (61.6% vs 48.4%) compared to single transplant 1
Busulfan and melphalan (BuMel) is preferred in European protocols based on superior EFS compared to CEM 1, 2
- However, higher risk of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome with BuMel 1
Special Considerations
For certain subgroups with more favorable high-risk disease, single transplant may be appropriate 1:
- Stage L2, ≥18 months, unfavorable histology, MYCN non-amplified
- Stage M, 12 to <18 months, MYCN non-amplified with unfavorable histology, diploid DNA, or SCAs
Patients with progressive disease during induction are not candidates for consolidation therapy and should receive non-myeloablative therapies 1
Patients with minor response or stable disease after induction require individualized approaches 1
Historical Regimens and Research
Earlier studies established the efficacy of several agents now incorporated into modern protocols:
- Cyclophosphamide has demonstrated significant activity in neuroblastoma 3, 4
- Platinum agents (cisplatin and carboplatin) have shown effectiveness even in refractory disease 5
- Dose-intensive regimens with shorter intervals between treatments may improve outcomes 6
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- No single regimen has been proven superior in prospective randomized trials comparing North American induction regimens 1
- Investigational approaches such as early addition of ALK inhibitors or anti-GD2 antibody therapy should only be used in clinical trials 1
- Toxicity management is crucial, particularly myelosuppression, mucositis, and hearing deficits 4
- Response assessment at the end of induction is critical for determining subsequent therapy 1