What is the typical chemotherapy regimen for neuroblastoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Neuroblastoma Chemotherapy Regimens

The preferred chemotherapy regimens for high-risk neuroblastoma are the 5-cycle ANBL12P1 or ANBL1531 induction protocols, which include combinations of topotecan, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, etoposide, and doxorubicin, followed by consolidation with tandem transplantation using high-dose chemotherapy. 1

Induction Therapy for High-Risk Neuroblastoma

Induction therapy aims to reduce disease burden before subsequent treatment phases through:

  • Multiagent cytoreductive chemotherapy combined with surgical resection of primary tumor and locoregional disease 1
  • Collection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells during induction to support later consolidation therapy 1

Preferred Induction Regimens:

  • ANBL12P1 or ANBL1531 (5-cycle regimens) - These are the NCCN-preferred protocols with:

    • Cycles 1-2: Topotecan and cyclophosphamide 1
    • Subsequent cycles: Cisplatin-based and alkylator-intensive combinations 1
    • Response rate: Approximately 80% of patients achieve partial response or better 1
  • ANBL0532 (6-cycle regimen) - An acceptable alternative regimen 1

    • Similar components but with longer duration
    • Demonstrated 39.1% partial response or better after first 2 cycles with topotecan and cyclophosphamide 1

Evolution of Induction Regimens:

The development of these protocols has been driven by:

  • Need to reduce exposure to nephrotoxic and cardiotoxic agents while maintaining efficacy 1
  • Evidence that 5-cycle induction achieves comparable response rates to longer 7-cycle regimens 1
  • Approximately 9% of patients progress despite intensive regimens 1

Surgical Considerations During Induction:

  • Upfront resection is rarely feasible due to aggressive nature of tumors 1
  • Surgical resection typically performed after several cycles of cytoreductive chemotherapy 1
  • Goal is gross total resection (>90% resection) rather than negative margins 1
  • Subtotal resection is recommended when vital structures would be threatened 1

Consolidation Therapy

For patients who respond adequately to induction therapy:

  • Tandem transplantation with two consecutive rounds of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue is recommended (Category 1) 1

    • First transplant: Thiotepa/cyclophosphamide
    • Second transplant: Reduced-dose carboplatin/etoposide/melphalan (CEM)
    • This approach showed significantly improved 3-year EFS (61.6% vs 48.4%) compared to single transplant 1
  • Busulfan and melphalan (BuMel) is preferred in European protocols based on superior EFS compared to CEM 1, 2

    • However, higher risk of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome with BuMel 1

Special Considerations

  • For certain subgroups with more favorable high-risk disease, single transplant may be appropriate 1:

    • Stage L2, ≥18 months, unfavorable histology, MYCN non-amplified
    • Stage M, 12 to <18 months, MYCN non-amplified with unfavorable histology, diploid DNA, or SCAs
  • Patients with progressive disease during induction are not candidates for consolidation therapy and should receive non-myeloablative therapies 1

  • Patients with minor response or stable disease after induction require individualized approaches 1

Historical Regimens and Research

Earlier studies established the efficacy of several agents now incorporated into modern protocols:

  • Cyclophosphamide has demonstrated significant activity in neuroblastoma 3, 4
  • Platinum agents (cisplatin and carboplatin) have shown effectiveness even in refractory disease 5
  • Dose-intensive regimens with shorter intervals between treatments may improve outcomes 6

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • No single regimen has been proven superior in prospective randomized trials comparing North American induction regimens 1
  • Investigational approaches such as early addition of ALK inhibitors or anti-GD2 antibody therapy should only be used in clinical trials 1
  • Toxicity management is crucial, particularly myelosuppression, mucositis, and hearing deficits 4
  • Response assessment at the end of induction is critical for determining subsequent therapy 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.