What are the current treatment options for high-risk neuroblastoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Updates on the Management of High-Risk Neuroblastoma

The current standard treatment for high-risk neuroblastoma consists of a four-phase approach: intensive induction chemotherapy (ANBL12P1 or ANBL1531 protocols with topotecan/cyclophosphamide-based regimens), consolidation with tandem autologous stem cell transplantation, post-consolidation immunotherapy with anti-GD2 antibody (dinutuximab) plus GM-CSF and isotretinoin, and continuation therapy with eflornithine for responders. 1

Induction Chemotherapy

Preferred Regimen:

  • The NCCN recommends 5 cycles of ANBL12P1 or ANBL1531 protocols, achieving approximately 80% partial response or better 2, 3
  • Cycles 1-2: Topotecan (1.2 mg/m²/day) + cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m²/day) for 5 days 2, 3
  • Cycles 3 and 5: Cisplatin (50 mg/m²/day for 4 days) + etoposide (200 mg/m²/day for 3 days) 2
  • Cycles 4 and 6: Cyclophosphamide (2100 mg/m²/day for 2 days) + doxorubicin (25 mg/m²/day) + vincristine (0.67 mg/m²/day for 3 days) 2

Surgical Timing:

  • Perform surgical resection after several cycles of cytoreductive chemotherapy, not upfront 1
  • Goal is gross total resection (>90% tumor removal or complete macroscopic resection), not negative margins 1
  • Accept subtotal resection when vital organs, major nerves, or major blood vessels would be compromised 1

Critical Pitfall: Do not attempt upfront resection or pursue negative margins at the expense of vital structures 1

End-Induction Response Assessment and Decision Points

For Partial Response or Better:

  • Proceed directly to consolidation with tandem transplantation 1
  • Consider bridging therapy for select patients with marginal partial response 1

For Minor Response or Stable Disease:

  • Switch to alternative chemotherapy regimens (high-dose cyclophosphamide-based or topotecan-containing) 2
  • Reassess after every 2 cycles to determine if adequate response achieved for consolidation 2
  • If still inadequate, consider chemoimmunotherapy (anti-GD2 + chemotherapy) or clinical trial enrollment 1

For Progressive Disease:

  • Do NOT proceed to consolidation therapy 1
  • Initiate chemoimmunotherapy combining anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody with chemotherapy 1
  • Consider clinical trial enrollment for first relapse 1

Critical Pitfall: Do not continue the same failing regimen beyond 2 cycles without modification 2

Consolidation Therapy

Tandem Transplantation (Preferred):

  • First transplant: Thiotepa/cyclophosphamide 1
  • Second transplant (6-10 weeks later): Dose-reduced carboplatin/etoposide/melphalan (CEM) 1
  • Outcome: 3-year EFS of 61.6% vs 48.4% with single transplant 1, 3

Alternative Regimen:

  • Busulfan/melphalan (BuMel) is preferred in Europe with superior EFS compared to CEM, but higher risk of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome 1
  • May be appropriate for patients with contraindication to tandem transplant 1

Single Transplant Exceptions: Two specific subgroups may receive single transplant with full-dose CEM (5-year EFS 75-80%): 1

  1. Stage L2, ≥18 months at diagnosis, unfavorable histology, AND MYCN non-amplified
  2. Stage M, 12 to <18 months at diagnosis, MYCN non-amplified, with unfavorable histology, diploid DNA, or segmental chromosomal aberrations

Radiation Therapy:

  • Administer 21.6 Gy to primary tumor site after recovery from stem cell rescue 1
  • Include sites of residual metastatic disease visible on ¹²³I-MIBG or FDG-PET at end-induction evaluation 1
  • Do NOT extend fields to uninvolved draining nodes (no benefit demonstrated) 1
  • Do NOT boost gross residual tumor beyond 21.6 Gy (no benefit demonstrated) 1

Post-Consolidation Immunotherapy

Standard Regimen:

  • Dinutuximab (anti-GD2 antibody) + GM-CSF (sargramostim) + isotretinoin for up to 5 cycles 1, 4
  • 2-year EFS: 66% vs 46% with isotretinoin alone 5
  • Do NOT add interleukin-2 (increased toxicity without improved outcomes) 1

Alternative:

  • Dinutuximab beta + isotretinoin without sargramostim (European approach) shows higher EFS than isotretinoin alone 1

FDA-Approved Indication: Dinutuximab is indicated in combination with GM-CSF, IL-2, and isotretinoin for pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma achieving at least partial response to prior first-line therapy 4

Continuation Therapy

Eflornithine (FDA-approved December 2023):

  • Dose: 750 mg/m² ± 250 mg/m² twice daily for up to 2 years 1
  • Indication: Patients achieving partial response or better following anti-GD2 immunotherapy 1
  • Outcomes: EFS HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.27-0.85); OS HR 0.32 (95% CI 0.15-0.70) compared to historical controls 1
  • NCCN Category 2B recommendation: Discuss as continuation therapy option with families 1

Critical Monitoring: Serial audiograms or brainstem auditory evoked response testing is essential due to ototoxicity risk during critical language development age 1

Monitoring During Treatment

Disease Evaluations:

  • Full assessment (CT/MRI, ¹²³I-MIBG or FDG-PET, bilateral bone marrow biopsies) at: end of induction, start of post-consolidation, and end of therapy 1
  • For >5 residual MIBG-avid sites at end-induction: repeat scan after stem cell rescue to prioritize radiotherapy targets 1

Organ Function Monitoring:

  • Renal function with nuclear medicine GFR measurements before consolidation 1, 3
  • Serial ECGs and echocardiograms for cardiac function 1, 3
  • Serial audiograms or brainstem auditory evoked response for hearing 1, 3
  • Frequent blood counts, chemistry panels, and urinalyses 1

Key Algorithmic Decision Points

  1. After induction: Partial response or better → tandem transplant; minor response/stable → alternative chemotherapy with reassessment every 2 cycles; progressive disease → chemoimmunotherapy or clinical trial 1, 2

  2. After consolidation: No progression → anti-GD2 immunotherapy; progression → chemoimmunotherapy or clinical trial 1

  3. After immunotherapy: Partial response or better → discuss eflornithine continuation 1

Critical Pitfall: The evidence does NOT support extending induction beyond standard protocols—adding topotecan courses increases toxicity without improving EFS 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Neuroblastoma Chemotherapy Regimens

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

High-Risk Neuroblastoma Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Chemo-Immunotherapy with Irinotecan in Neuroblastoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.