Eplerenone vs. Spironolactone: Which is Better for Heart Failure and Resistant Hypertension
Eplerenone is better than spironolactone for treating heart failure and resistant hypertension due to its more favorable side effect profile and recent evidence showing lower mortality rates, despite requiring twice-daily dosing in some cases. 1
Efficacy Comparison
- Both eplerenone and spironolactone are mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) that effectively treat heart failure and resistant hypertension 2
- The most recent meta-analysis (2024) demonstrated that eplerenone is associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR = 0.78) and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.54) compared to spironolactone in heart failure patients 1
- Both medications are considered preferred agents for treating primary aldosteronism and resistant hypertension 2
- Eplerenone often requires twice-daily dosing (50-100 mg/day) for adequate blood pressure control, while spironolactone typically requires only once-daily dosing (25-100 mg/day) 2
Side Effect Profile
- Spironolactone is associated with significantly higher risk of gynecomastia and impotence compared to eplerenone due to its non-selective binding to progesterone and androgen receptors 2
- Eplerenone was specifically designed with a 9,11-epoxide group to avoid the hormone-associated side effects of spironolactone 2
- The risk of gynecomastia with eplerenone is dramatically lower (RR = 0.07) compared to spironolactone 1
- Both medications carry similar risks of hyperkalemia, requiring monitoring of potassium levels and renal function 3, 4
- Treatment withdrawal is significantly less common with eplerenone (RR = 0.69) compared to spironolactone 1
Clinical Decision Algorithm
First-line choice: Eplerenone (50-100 mg/day) due to:
Dosing considerations:
Special populations: