The Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) System for Cervical Trauma
The Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) System and Injury Severity Score provides level I evidence with excellent reliability and class I recommendations for grading instability and fracture patterns in patients with cervical spinal traumatic injury. 1
Core Components of the SLIC System
The SLIC system identifies three major injury characteristics to describe subaxial cervical injuries:
Injury Morphology: Assesses the pattern of bony and soft tissue injury, with points assigned based on severity 2
- Compression (1 point)
- Burst fracture (2 points)
- Distraction (3 points)
- Rotation/translation (4 points)
Discoligamentous Complex (DLC) Integrity: Evaluates the status of the supporting ligamentous structures 2, 3
- Intact (0 points)
- Indeterminate (1 point)
- Disrupted (2 points)
Neurological Status: Incorporates the patient's neurological condition, a critical factor absent in earlier classification systems 2, 4
- Intact (0 points)
- Root injury (1 point)
- Complete cord injury (2 points)
- Incomplete cord injury (3 points)
- Continuous cord compression (+1 point)
Clinical Application and Decision-Making
The sum of scores from the three major components constitutes the injury severity score, which guides treatment decisions 4, 5
- SLIC score of 0-3: Conservative management recommended
- SLIC score of 4: Borderline, surgeon discretion advised
- SLIC score of ≥5: Surgical intervention recommended
Patients with SLIC scores 1-3 typically have intact neurological status with minor fractures (spinous process, laminar, or small facet fractures) and are managed conservatively 6
Patients with SLIC scores 5-10 include those with distraction and rotational injuries, traumatic disc herniation with neurological deficit, and burst fractures with incomplete neurologic deficit, requiring surgical intervention 6
Advantages of the SLIC System
Incorporates neurological status, which was absent in earlier classification systems, providing more comprehensive assessment 2, 3
Demonstrates excellent reliability with intraclass coefficients (ICC) for the three primary components ranging between 0.49 and 0.90, superior to conventional classification schemes (ICC between 0.41 and 0.53) 3
Assists clinicians in managing complex cervical fracture-dislocation injuries by providing guidance on the need for decompression, realignment, and stabilization 1
Prospective validation has shown the SLIC system to be safe and effective in guiding surgical treatment decisions for subaxial cervical spine trauma 4
Clinical Significance and Implementation
The SLIC system overcomes limitations of earlier classification systems (Harris, Allen) which demonstrated low reliability with low intraclass correlation coefficients 1
Use of the SLIC system can assist in determining whether patients require surgical decompression of the spinal canal and cord, followed by spinal realignment and stabilization 1
While the SLIC system provides guidance on the need for surgical intervention, it does not offer specific recommendations for detailed surgical management approaches 1
The system is designed to be simple to apply while providing both diagnostic and prognostic information 2
Cautions and Limitations
The SLIC system does not provide specific recommendations for detailed surgical management, including approach selection (anterior, posterior, or combined) 1
While the system guides the need for surgical intervention, specific treatment strategies remain variable based on fracture pattern, associated characteristics, institutional resources, and surgeon preferences 1
Careful assessment of all three components is essential for accurate classification and appropriate treatment planning 5, 3