What are alternative treatment options for Diabetes Mellitus (DM) if insurance does not cover Trulicity (dulaglutide)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Alternative Treatments for Diabetes Mellitus When Trulicity Is Not Covered by Insurance

For patients whose insurance won't cover Trulicity (dulaglutide) for diabetes mellitus, other GLP-1 receptor agonists or alternative medication classes should be considered based on cardiovascular risk, renal function, and weight management needs. 1

First-Line Considerations

  • Metformin should remain the foundation of therapy when adding second agents, as long as it's tolerated and not contraindicated 2
  • For patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure, or chronic kidney disease, an SGLT2 inhibitor or alternative GLP-1 receptor agonist with demonstrated cardiovascular benefit should be considered regardless of A1C level 2, 1
  • Treatment intensification should not be delayed if glycemic targets aren't met within approximately 3 months 2

Alternative GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

  • Other GLP-1 receptor agonists available include exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, and semaglutide, which have similar mechanisms of action to dulaglutide 2, 3
  • These agents effectively lower glucose, reduce cardiovascular risk, and promote weight loss similar to dulaglutide 2, 4
  • Common side effects include gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting) that typically diminish over time 2, 3
  • Avoid GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with recent heart failure decompensation 2

SGLT2 Inhibitors as Alternative

  • SGLT2 inhibitors (canagliflozin, empagliflozin, dapagliflozin) lower A1C by 0.7-1.0% and provide cardiovascular and renal protection in high-risk patients 1
  • Particularly beneficial for patients with heart failure or chronic kidney disease 2, 1
  • Side effects include genital mycotic infections, urinary tract infections, and volume depletion 5
  • Monitor for rare but serious side effects including diabetic ketoacidosis, lower limb amputation risk (canagliflozin), and Fournier's gangrene 5

Other Medication Options

  • DPP-4 inhibitors have moderate glucose-lowering effects with minimal hypoglycemia risk and weight neutrality, but avoid in heart failure patients 2, 1
  • Sulfonylureas are inexpensive and effective but carry higher hypoglycemia risk and potential weight gain 2, 1
  • Thiazolidinediones improve insulin sensitivity but are contraindicated in heart failure and may cause weight gain 2
  • Basal insulin remains highly effective when hyperglycemia is severe (A1C >10% or blood glucose >300 mg/dL) 2, 1

Treatment Algorithm Based on Patient Characteristics

For Patients with Cardiovascular Disease:

  • First choice: SGLT2 inhibitor with proven cardiovascular benefit 2, 1
  • Alternative: Another GLP-1 receptor agonist with cardiovascular benefit (liraglutide, semaglutide) 2, 1

For Patients with Heart Failure:

  • First choice: SGLT2 inhibitor 2
  • Avoid: Thiazolidinediones (contraindicated) and some DPP-4 inhibitors 2

For Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease:

  • First choice: SGLT2 inhibitor if eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73m² 2, 1
  • Alternative: GLP-1 receptor agonist (liraglutide has shown renal benefits) 6

For Patients with Obesity:

  • First choice: Alternative GLP-1 receptor agonist (liraglutide, semaglutide) 1, 4
  • Second choice: SGLT2 inhibitor 1

For Elderly Patients or Those at High Risk of Hypoglycemia:

  • Avoid sulfonylureas and insulin if possible 1
  • Consider SGLT2 inhibitors or DPP-4 inhibitors 1

Important Considerations

  • Medication regimens should be reevaluated every 3-6 months and adjusted as needed 1
  • Initial combination therapy may be considered for patients with A1C levels 1.5-2.0% above target 1
  • For severe hyperglycemia (A1C >10%), consider insulin therapy (with or without other agents) 2
  • Patient factors including cost, side effect profile, injection preference, and comorbidities should guide therapy selection 2

Practical Approach to Insurance Denial

  • Request coverage for an alternative GLP-1 receptor agonist that may be on the insurance formulary 1
  • Consider appealing the insurance denial with clinical documentation of medical necessity 1
  • Explore patient assistance programs from pharmaceutical manufacturers 1
  • If cost is prohibitive for all GLP-1 receptor agonists, prioritize SGLT2 inhibitors for patients with cardiovascular or renal disease, or consider more affordable options like sulfonylureas with careful monitoring 2, 1

References

Guideline

Options for Additional Medication for Diabetes After Metformin

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

GLP-1 agonists: A review for emergency clinicians.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2024

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.