What is the mortality rate for haploidentical bone marrow transplants?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Mortality Rates for Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplants

Haploidentical bone marrow transplantation carries a significant mortality risk, with historical data showing transplant-related mortality rates of approximately 40% overall, with 25% mortality within the first 100 days post-transplant. 1

Historical Mortality Data

  • Myeloablative haploidentical transplants have shown high early mortality rates, with one SWOG trial reporting a 45% 6-month mortality rate, which led to early closure of the allogeneic arm of the study 1
  • Long-term data from this trial showed that despite high early mortality, the overall survival at 7 years was 39%, with a plateau in the survival curve suggesting some patients achieved long-term survival 1

Mortality Based on Patient Age

  • Age significantly impacts mortality rates in haploidentical transplantation:
    • For patients <16 years of age: Overall survival of approximately 95% 1
    • For patients ≥16 years of age: Overall survival of approximately 81% 1
    • Recent CIBMTR analysis showed higher mortality in patients >13 years of age following myeloablative conditioning with matched sibling donor transplants 1

Conditioning Regimen Impact on Mortality

  • Non-myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have been developed to decrease mortality while preserving graft-versus-tumor effects 1
  • Recent studies using reduced-intensity conditioning show improved outcomes:
    • A 2018 study using RIC with ATG and post-transplant cyclophosphamide reported 6-month overall survival of 73.9% and 1-year overall survival of 48.1% 2
    • A 2017 pediatric/young adult study using non-myeloablative conditioning reported 1-year transplant-related mortality of 13% and 1-year overall survival of 56% 3

Causes of Mortality

  • Infection is the most common cause of death in haploidentical transplants, accounting for approximately 18% of deaths in recent studies 2
  • Other common causes include:
    • Graft failure (though rates have improved with modern protocols) 4
    • Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) 1
    • Disease relapse 5
    • Hemorrhage 5

Recent Advances in Haploidentical Transplantation

  • Modern approaches using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide have significantly improved outcomes:
    • A 2013 study reported 18% transplant-related mortality with myeloablative conditioning 5
    • A 2022 trial in severe aplastic anemia patients showed 81% 1-year overall survival with haploidentical transplantation 6

Risk Factors for Higher Mortality

  • Factors associated with worse outcomes include:
    • Older age (>55 years) 1
    • Chemoresistant disease 1
    • More than one prior transplant 1
    • Active disease at time of transplant 5
    • Poor performance status 4

GVHD Impact on Mortality

  • GVHD rates vary by age and conditioning regimen:
    • For patients ≤16 years: acute GVHD (grade 2-4) 12.6%; chronic GVHD 14.6% 1
    • For patients >16 years: acute GVHD (grade 2-4) 16%; chronic GVHD 23% 1
  • Modern GVHD prophylaxis regimens have reduced these rates significantly, with recent studies showing grade III-IV acute GVHD rates as low as 5.2% 2

In summary, while historical mortality rates for haploidentical transplants were quite high (40% overall), modern approaches with reduced-intensity conditioning and improved GVHD prophylaxis have significantly improved outcomes, with recent studies showing 1-year survival rates between 48-81% depending on patient and disease characteristics.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.