What are the treatment options for sacroiliac (SI) joint pain?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Options for Sacroiliac (SI) Joint Pain

For patients with sacroiliac joint pain, a stepwise approach starting with conservative management and progressing to interventional procedures is recommended, with cooled radiofrequency ablation showing the strongest evidence for refractory cases.

Diagnostic Criteria

  • SI joint pain should be diagnosed when patients demonstrate at least 3 of 5 positive provocative physical examination tests, which provides a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 78% 1
  • Pain is typically localized to the sacrum, buttock, and posterior thigh region 2, 1
  • Diagnostic SI joint injections with at least 70-80% pain relief confirm the SI joint as the primary pain generator 2, 1

First-Line Treatment Options

  • NSAIDs are conditionally recommended as adjunct therapy for SI joint pain 3
  • Physical therapy is strongly recommended over no treatment, with supervised exercise (active interventions) conditionally recommended over passive interventions 3
  • Land-based physical therapy is conditionally recommended over aquatic therapy interventions 3

Second-Line Treatment Options

  • Intra-articular SI joint injections with corticosteroids have moderate level evidence for short-term effectiveness 3
  • For isolated active sacroiliitis despite NSAIDs, locally administered parenteral glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended 3
  • Peri-articular (extra-articular) SI joint injections may also be therapeutic, with some research suggesting potentially greater response rates compared to intra-articular injections 3

Third-Line Treatment Options

  • Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the L5 dorsal ramus and S1-3 (or S4) lateral branches is supported by numerous studies 4
  • Cooled radiofrequency ablation has the strongest evidence among RFA techniques 4
  • After failed SI joint intra-articular steroid injection, cooled RF or standard RF can be considered (weak recommendation) 3

Fourth-Line Treatment Options

  • SI joint fusion may be considered for patients who fail conservative and interventional treatments 5, 6
  • Minimally invasive SI joint fusion has shown effectiveness in reducing pain and improving function in patients with chronic SI joint pain 5, 7
  • Patients must demonstrate at least 70% pain relief from diagnostic SI joint injections to be considered appropriate candidates for SI joint fusion 2, 5

Special Considerations

  • For patients with inflammatory sacroiliitis (such as in spondyloarthropathies), TNF inhibitors are strongly recommended over no treatment with TNFi when NSAIDs fail 3
  • Secukinumab or ixekizumab are strongly recommended for active ankylosing spondylitis with sacroiliitis that fails NSAID therapy 3
  • Novel treatments being investigated include prolotherapy with dextrose water, platelet-rich plasma, and subcutaneous spinal cord stimulation 3, 8

Treatment Algorithm

  1. Begin with NSAIDs and physical therapy (supervised exercise) for 4-6 weeks 3, 4
  2. If inadequate response, proceed to intra-articular or peri-articular SI joint corticosteroid injection 3, 1
  3. For patients with >50% relief lasting at least 2 months, repeat injections may be appropriate when symptoms recur 1
  4. For patients with inadequate response to injections, radiofrequency ablation (preferably cooled RFA) should be considered 3, 4
  5. For persistent pain despite RF procedures, minimally invasive SI joint fusion may be considered in patients with confirmed SI joint pain (>70% relief with diagnostic blocks) 2, 5

Common Pitfalls

  • Proceeding with SI joint interventions without confirming the SI joint as the primary pain generator can lead to treatment failure 2
  • Using fewer than 3 positive provocative tests reduces the specificity for diagnosing SI joint pain 3, 1
  • Failing to consider inflammatory causes of sacroiliitis that may require specific disease-modifying treatments 3
  • Performing SI joint fusion without adequate diagnostic confirmation exposes patients to surgical risks without high likelihood of benefit 2

References

Guideline

Sacroiliac Joint Injection Medical Necessity

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

5. Sacroiliac joint pain.

Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2024

Guideline

Medical Necessity of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.