What are the recommended types of infusion for fluid resuscitation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended Types of Infusion for Fluid Resuscitation

Crystalloids are the recommended first-choice fluids for initial resuscitation and subsequent intravascular volume replacement in patients requiring fluid resuscitation. 1, 2

Primary Fluid Choices

  • Crystalloids should be used as the initial fluid of choice in the resuscitation of patients with hypovolemia, sepsis, and septic shock 1, 2, 3
  • Either balanced crystalloids (such as Ringer's lactate) or normal saline (0.9% NaCl) can be used, though balanced solutions may be preferred due to concerns about hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis with normal saline 1, 3
  • The most recent evidence suggests that initial fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution compared to 0.9% saline may be associated with improved survival in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension 4
  • An initial fluid challenge of at least 30 mL/kg of crystalloids is recommended within the first 3 hours for patients with sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion 1, 2, 3

Secondary Fluid Options

  • Albumin may be considered in addition to crystalloids for initial resuscitation and subsequent intravascular volume replacement when patients require substantial amounts of crystalloids 1, 2, 3
  • Hydroxyethyl starches should NOT be used for intravascular volume replacement due to increased risk of mortality and renal replacement therapy, particularly in septic patients 1, 2, 5
  • Crystalloids are recommended over gelatins when resuscitating patients 1
  • Dextrans are used less often due to problems with anaphylaxis and potential increased risk of renal failure 6

Administration Technique

  • A fluid challenge technique should be applied where fluid administration is continued as long as hemodynamic factors continue to improve 1, 2
  • Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness (e.g., change in pulse pressure, stroke volume variation) are preferred over static variables (e.g., central venous pressure) to guide ongoing fluid administration 1, 2
  • More rapid administration and greater amounts of fluid may be needed in some patients based on clinical response 1, 3

Special Considerations

  • For patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, crystalloids are also recommended as the initial fluid of choice 1
  • In trauma patients, albumin appears to be associated with increased mortality and should be avoided 1
  • In neonatal and pediatric hypovolemic shock, rapid fluid resuscitation in excess of 40 ml/kg in the first hour may be associated with improved survival 1
  • For patients with low ejection fraction, consider smaller fluid boluses with frequent reassessment rather than the standard 30 mL/kg 2

Monitoring Response to Fluid Resuscitation

  • Assess for signs of adequate tissue perfusion, including improved mental status, urine output, and peripheral perfusion 2, 7
  • Monitor for signs of fluid overload, such as pulmonary crackles, increased jugular venous pressure, and worsening respiratory function 2, 7
  • Guiding resuscitation to normalize lactate levels in patients with elevated lactate as a marker of tissue hypoperfusion is recommended 2

Common Pitfalls

  • Delayed fluid resuscitation increases mortality; immediate fluid resuscitation is required in shock states 3
  • Reliance on static measures like central venous pressure alone to guide fluid therapy is no longer recommended due to poor predictive ability for fluid responsiveness 2, 3
  • Fluid overresuscitation should be avoided as it can delay organ recovery, prolong ICU stay, and increase mortality 2, 8
  • The standard 30 mL/kg fluid recommendation may need modification based on individual patient characteristics, particularly cardiac function 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Septic Shock

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Initial Fluid Bolus for Sepsis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2018

Research

Fluid resuscitation: colloids vs crystalloids.

Acta clinica Belgica, 2007

Guideline

Initial Management for Septic Shock Due to Cellulitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.