When is prophylactic plasma exchange (PPE) recommended?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prophylactic Plasma Exchange: Indications and Recommendations

Prophylactic plasma exchange (PPE) is generally not recommended for most clinical scenarios and should be reserved for specific high-risk patient populations with certain conditions, particularly those at high risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in ANCA-associated vasculitis. 1

ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (AAV)

Glomerulonephritis in AAV

  • For patients with AAV and low or low-moderate risk of developing ESKD, immunosuppression alone is recommended rather than adding plasma exchange, regardless of pulmonary hemorrhage status 1
  • For patients with AAV and moderate-high or high risk of developing ESKD, plasma exchange may be considered as it can reduce progression to ESKD, though with increased risk of serious infections 1
  • The benefit of plasma exchange is most pronounced in patients with the highest risk of ESKD (118 fewer cases of ESRD per 1,000 cases of active glomerulonephritis) 1
  • Plasma exchange does not reduce mortality in AAV patients with glomerulonephritis (risk ratio 1.15) 1

Pulmonary Hemorrhage in AAV

  • For patients with active, severe AAV with alveolar hemorrhage, plasma exchange is conditionally not recommended in addition to standard remission induction therapies 1
  • No differences in mortality or remission rates have been observed in trials evaluating plasma exchange for alveolar hemorrhage 1
  • Plasma exchange may be considered as "salvage" or "rescue" therapy for critically ill patients not responding to recommended remission induction therapies 1

Other Conditions

COVID-19

  • The AABB suggests against prophylactic COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion for uninfected persons with close contact exposure to COVID-19 (weak recommendation, low-certainty evidence) 1

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) and Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)

  • Therapeutic plasma exchange is the recommended treatment for idiopathic familial and nonfamilial TTP as well as HUS not associated with diarrhea 2
  • High-dose plasma infusion may be an alternative first-line therapy when therapeutic plasma exchange is not immediately available 3

Risks and Complications of Plasma Exchange

  • Plasma exchange is associated with several complications, including:
    • Mild to moderate adverse reactions occur in approximately 25% of procedures 4
    • Severe, life-threatening adverse events occur in approximately 0.7% of procedures 4
    • Common complications include hypocalcemia, hypovolemia, and anaphylactoid reactions 5
    • Serious complications include cardiovascular events (0.2%), respiratory events (0.2%), and anaphylactoid reactions (0.25%) 5
    • Increased risk of serious infections (risk ratio 1.19) in AAV patients 1

Practical Considerations

  • Plasma exchange requires intravenous lines or central venous catheters that may cause discomfort or increase the risk of infection, clotting, or bleeding 1
  • Potential need for blood products with plasma exchange 1
  • Plasma exchange may affect the pharmacokinetics of some drugs 1
  • Prophylactic calcium administration lowers the incidence of hypocalcemic symptoms during plasma exchange 5
  • Treatments using albumin as volume replacement are associated with fewer adverse reactions compared to those using fresh-frozen plasma (1.4% vs 20%) 5

Key Takeaways

  • Prophylactic plasma exchange is not routinely recommended for most conditions 1
  • The strongest indication for considering plasma exchange is in AAV patients with high risk of progression to ESKD 1
  • The decision to use plasma exchange should balance potential benefits against risks, particularly the increased risk of serious infections 1
  • Plasma exchange is relatively safe when performed properly, but serious complications can occur 4, 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Therapeutic plasma exchange in the intensive care setting.

Therapeutic apheresis : official journal of the International Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Apheresis, 2001

Research

Predictors of complications in therapeutic plasma exchange.

Journal of clinical apheresis, 2009

Research

Therapeutic plasma exchange: complications and management.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 1994

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.