Systematic Approach to ECG Interpretation
To accurately interpret an electrocardiogram (ECG), follow a systematic approach that evaluates rate, rhythm, intervals, axis, and morphology while considering the clinical context, as this methodology significantly reduces diagnostic errors and improves patient outcomes. 1
Step-by-Step ECG Interpretation Algorithm
1. Assess Technical Quality
- Evaluate the quality of the recording and identify any technical artifacts that may affect interpretation 1
- Ensure proper lead placement, as misplaced electrodes can significantly alter ECG interpretation and lead to false diagnoses 1
2. Calculate Heart Rate
- Count the number of QRS complexes in a 6-second strip and multiply by 10, or use the formula 300 divided by the number of large boxes between consecutive R waves 1
- Normal sinus rhythm has a rate between 60-100 beats per minute in adults 1
3. Determine Rhythm
- Identify the underlying rhythm by examining if there's a P wave before each QRS complex with consistent PR interval (sinus rhythm) 1
- Note any irregularities such as premature beats, pauses, or completely irregular patterns that might suggest atrial fibrillation 1
4. Measure Intervals
- PR interval: Normal 120-200 ms (3-5 small boxes) 1
- QRS duration: Normal <120 ms (less than 3 small boxes) 1
- QT interval: Calculate QTc using Bazett's formula, with normal values <450 ms for men and <460 ms for women 1
5. Determine Electrical Axis
- Examine leads I and aVF: 1
- Normal axis: +90° to -30° (positive in both leads I and aVF)
- Left axis deviation: -30° to -90° (positive in lead I, negative in aVF)
- Right axis deviation: +90° to +180° (negative in lead I, positive in aVF)
- Extreme axis deviation: +180° to -90° (negative in both leads I and aVF)
6. Assess Chamber Enlargement
- Look for voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: S in V1 + R in V5 or V6 >3.5 mV 1
- Assess for atrial enlargement patterns 1
7. Evaluate for Ischemia, Injury, and Infarction
- Examine ST-segment deviations: ST elevation (>0.1 mV in limb leads or >0.15-0.2 mV in precordial leads) may indicate acute injury 1
- Look for T-wave abnormalities (inversion, hyperacute, flattening) 1
- Identify pathological Q waves (>0.04 seconds or >25% of the R wave amplitude) suggesting myocardial infarction 1
- Note the location of abnormalities to determine the affected coronary territory 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Over-reliance on computer interpretation without physician verification, as errors in computer interpretation are still common 1, 2
- Interpreting ECG findings in isolation without considering clinical context 1
- Failure to compare with previous ECGs when available 1
- Inadequate filtering settings, which can distort waveforms and affect measurements 1
Maintaining ECG Interpretation Competency
- Continuing medical education through seminars or self-assessment programs is essential, especially for physicians who read ECGs infrequently 2
- Consider periodic self-study to ensure skills remain current 2
- Utilize available resources such as quality improvement programs with ECG overreading and feedback by expert electrocardiographers, self-paced interactive computer modules, and workshops 2
Clinical Context Importance
- Always interpret the ECG in the context of the patient's clinical presentation, as the same ECG finding may have different implications depending on symptoms 1, 3
- Noncardiologists are more affected by the context of the patient's clinical history and automated computer interpretation than cardiologists when interpreting an ECG 2
- Cardiologists demonstrate greater accuracy than noncardiologists in ECG interpretation during standardized examinations when minimal history is given 2
By following this systematic approach to ECG interpretation, you can improve diagnostic accuracy and enhance patient care through proper identification of cardiac abnormalities.