What is the treatment protocol for erectile dysfunction (ED) using acoustic radio wave therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Protocol for Erectile Dysfunction with Acoustic Radio Wave Therapy

Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiSWT) is not currently included in major erectile dysfunction treatment guidelines as a first-line therapy, but may be considered as an adjunctive treatment option for men with mild vasculogenic erectile dysfunction, particularly those who are non-responsive to PDE5 inhibitors. 1

Current Position of LiSWT in ED Treatment Algorithm

  • Standard first-line treatments for erectile dysfunction include FDA-approved oral PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, and avanafil), which should be offered with proper dosing instructions and titration before considering alternative therapies 1
  • LiSWT is considered an innovative treatment modality that requires further large-scale, placebo-controlled studies for full clinical validation 1
  • The European Association of Urology guidelines (2025) recommend that LiSWT may be used in men with mild vasculogenic ED (weak recommendation) 1

LiSWT Protocol Parameters Based on Available Evidence

  • Most common device settings in clinical studies:

    • Energy density: 0.09 mJ/mm² 2, 3
    • Frequency: 5 Hz 2
    • Number of shocks: Typically 1,500 shocks per session (900 to penis shaft/base/hilum and 600 to proximal corpora/crura) 2
    • Treatment schedule: 4-12 sessions, with weekly treatments being most common 2, 3
  • Alternative protocol observed in clinical practice:

    • 3,000 shocks per session at 0.09 mJ/mm² for focused regimens 3
    • 10,000 shocks per session at 15 Hz and 90 mJ for non-focused regimens 3

Clinical Efficacy and Patient Selection

  • LiSWT has shown modest improvements in erectile function in some studies, with mean IIEF-EF score improvements of 3.5 points compared to sham treatment at 3-month follow-up 4
  • Most beneficial for patients with:
    • Mild to moderate vasculogenic ED 1
    • PDE5 inhibitor non-responders (52.5% of treated patients achieved EHS >2 at 6 months vs 27.8% in sham group) 4
  • Treatment effects have been reported to last up to 2 years in some studies 5

Safety Profile

  • LiSWT is generally considered safe with minimal adverse events reported across studies 2, 3, 4
  • No significant side effects were observed in comparative studies of different shockwave technologies 3
  • The non-invasive nature of the treatment makes it an attractive option for patients who reject more invasive therapies 4

Important Clinical Considerations

  • LiSWT should not replace comprehensive ED evaluation and management:

    • Thorough medical, sexual, and psychosocial history is essential 1
    • Physical examination and selective laboratory testing (including morning total testosterone) should be completed 1
    • ED may be a risk marker for underlying cardiovascular disease that requires evaluation 1
  • LiSWT may be more effective when combined with other treatments:

    • Combination with PDE5 inhibitors, vacuum erection devices, or daily tadalafil may enhance results 1
    • Psychosexual counseling should be considered to address psychological factors and improve treatment adherence 1, 6

Limitations and Caveats

  • Despite promising results, there is still no standardized treatment protocol for LiSWT 2
  • The clinical significance of improvements may not be perceived as meaningful by all patients 1
  • LiSWT should be presented as an adjunctive rather than primary treatment option given the stronger evidence supporting PDE5 inhibitors 1
  • Treatment decisions should be made jointly by the physician, patient, and when possible, the partner, considering preferences, expectations, and the physician's judgment 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.