Significance of a 3.5 x 2.2 x 2.4 cm Mildly Lobulated Hepatic Cyst with Fatty Liver
A 3.5 x 2.2 x 2.4 cm mildly lobulated hepatic cyst in a 55-year-old male with fatty liver is most likely a benign finding (ONCO-RADS category 2) that requires no specific intervention unless symptomatic. 1
Classification and Risk Assessment
- Simple hepatic cysts are common findings, occurring in up to 15-18% of the population, and are typically benign with no clinical significance 2
- According to the Oncologically Relevant Findings Reporting and Data System (ONCO-RADS), hepatic cysts are classified as Category 2 (benign finding highly likely) 1
- The presence of fatty liver (steatosis) is a separate finding also classified as Category 2 (benign finding highly likely) and is not directly related to the cyst 1
- The size of this cyst (3.5 x 2.2 x 2.4 cm) is within the range typically considered benign and not requiring intervention 1, 3
Evaluation of Concerning Features
- The mildly lobulated appearance warrants assessment for worrisome features that could suggest a mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) rather than a simple cyst 1
- Worrisome features would include:
- Based on the description provided, the cyst appears to have mild lobulation but no other concerning features that would suggest malignancy 1, 4
Clinical Implications
- Asymptomatic simple hepatic cysts do not require treatment, regardless of size 3
- Symptoms, if they develop, typically occur when cysts become large (particularly >8 cm) and may include:
- Potential complications of hepatic cysts include:
Management Recommendations
- For asymptomatic cysts like this one, observation is appropriate with no specific intervention needed 3
- If symptoms develop, management options include:
Follow-up Considerations
- No specific follow-up is required for asymptomatic simple hepatic cysts 3
- The fatty liver finding should be addressed separately with appropriate lifestyle modifications and metabolic risk factor management 1
- If the cyst develops any concerning features on future imaging (increasing size, development of mural nodules, thick irregular septations), further evaluation with MRI would be warranted 1, 4